I have followed the thread of discussion on accident
statistics with some interest, although the extract from the text book on
statistical method went completely over my head.
The analysis of accidents is fine and may highlight some
weaknesses of the present system, but it is history. What has been lacking to
date is a sound, reasoned strategy for the future.
I do not accept the proposal that all training should be
concentrated in a small number of professional glider training
schools.
My reasons for adopting this stance are as
follows:
While I may seem overcritical of fulltime schools, I am not
blind to the shortcomings of the weekend clubs:
While the instructor currency and training are matters of
concern to the GFA, introduction of a self launching training glider, designed to a new paradigm, could assist overcome the
latter problems. In earlier correspondence I termed this the Kookaburra Mk 5.
This was interpreted by some people as a 1950's retro glider. This was not
intended. The only common elements with the 1950's glider would be versatility
and affordability.
Would anybody care to add to the design criteria:
Side by side seating`
Self
launching
Inexpensive, both capital cost and operating cost.
Available as complete aircraft or kit construction.
Minimum 30/1 glide angle and a rate of climb under power greater than
500ft/min.
Optional engine to allow use as glider tug.
Good
handling qualities.
Must
present to student as a glider, rather than a powerplane with long
wings.
Safety capsule surrounding cockpit.
You could ask, "Why not buy a used Motor Falke?" I have only
flown one some years ago and was not impressed with neither the climb nor
glide performance plus the handling. The aircraft I imagine closest to the
design criteria would be an SZD Olgar if you put the engine on steriods and
installed a folding propellor. Neither use modern materials in their
structure.
You might think I have strayed from the original topic of
safety! Let me assure you that my interest is in the training of new pilots;
equiping them with the skills to be safe competent cross-country pilots, in the
most efficient and practical method possible.
Any response?
colinc
|