Mark,
 
    In trying to understand your explanation, and wanting to fully grasp the way these things work, I looked again at the Flarm video on DG's website http://www.dg-download.de/Videos/flarm-rennes.wmv.
 
    In that case the display alarms initially at the 12.30/01.00 LED, which is about where the other glider is, when the tracks of the 2 aircraft appear to be intersecting but when there also appears to be a reasonable height separation ..... and it looks to me like there was not a "risk of collision".
 
    The pilot then bears away to starboard and turns back to port to fly directly at or towards the other aircraft.
 
    It looks to me that there is a greater risk of collision after he turns back to port towards the other ship when it is visible in his screen ........... yet the alarm doesn't sound again until he is reasonably close.
 
    So given your explanation, why did it alert initially in this case, and why didn't it continue to provide an alert when the pilot turned back towards the other glider?
 
Regards Geoff
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Zaon Flight Systems collision avoidance

Mike Cleaver wrote:

    [ FLARM ]
> The unit contains an internal GPS engine and transmits GPS position
> about once a second.  It also receives other units' position over a
> range of around 3km and displays them as a conflict alert when they get
> too close.

No, that's a common misconception.  FLARM emits a conflict alert
when they get too close *and there is a risk of collision*.

Proximity with diverging headings won't cause an alarm.  Proximity
with converging headings will.

So it can be used in a crowded thermal.  It might be occasionally
annoying, but not in the way that a lot of people who haven't quite
"got" the idea that it isn't a basic proximity alarm seem to think.
It will deal with a gaggle without constantly "going off", as long
as the gliders in the gaggle aren't converging on each other.

(I'm not sure why you said "Correct in part" as if I'd posted some
kind of inaccuracy, then went on to post a heap of stuff which didn't
contradict any of my comments at all, only barely even /addressed/ them,
and which was, itself, inaccurate :-)

   - mark

--------------------------------------------------------------------
I tried an internal modem,                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      but it hurt when I walked.                          Mark Newton
----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82231777 -----
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to