on behalf of Andrew W

****** Forwarded Message Follows *******
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Anthony
(I can not submit to Aus-soaring but this might be interesting for the 
group to know.)
        A company overseas called "Jet RPM" already has retrofit jet 
engines from 30 to 70 kg thrust for gliders for sale.  The web site is;
 http://www.jet-rpm.com/en/indexEn.htm

        According to my calculations I will get 2 knots climb rate with a 
22 kg jet.  In Europe they give ASH25Ms a short car tow to get them 
off the ground quickly on short strips and then they climb away on the 
engine.  I would be more than happy to take a winch or short autotow 
and jet away with 30kg of thrust behind me.

        I'm ready to become "Roger Ram Jet" anyday.

Regards
Andrew Wright

Date sent:              Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:35:42 +0950
From:                   Anthony Smith 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                RE: [Aus-soaring] Jets
To:                     David Lawley 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Copies to:              Send reply to:          
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
        "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in 
Australia."
        <aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net>

> >From a standing start the prop will probably get around
> 50-55kg thrust depending on engine and prop.
> 
> As you get moving the props ability to produce thrust will
> start to reduce but the jet will keep on producing a
> relatively constant thrust.  
> 
> You will get to a speed where the jet will start producing
> more thrust and start to overtake the prop.
> 
> Where the jests get an additional advantage is they are
> significantly lighter than the piston / prop combination
> 
> > Far out guys!
> > 
> > It sounds to me as though the only way to get an answer is
> > for me to get a LARGE spring balance scale, fixed firmly
> > to the ground and a rope attached to a glider with say
> > 60HP self launch, on a bitumen runway, go to full throttle
> > and see how hard it pulls, then do the same with a 25 kg
> > jet, as that will give a comparison of the actual standing
> > start power(But the prop type will need a spring balance
> > that measures to infinity, doesn't sound right to me
> > somehow)
> > 
> > Well either that or go get a math's degree!
> > 
> > Thank goodness I didn't ask for the complex answer!
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sent: Monday, 26
> > March 2007 9:36 AM To: David Lawley
> > Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] Jets
> > 
> > For a prop aircraft:
> > 
> > Thrust available = prop efficiency x power / speed.
> > 
> > which so far doesn't make a lot of sense when speed = 0
> > because it makes the thrust available infinite.
> > 
> > Prop efficiency largely depends on the prop adavance
> > ratio:
> > 
> > Adv ratio = speed / (rpm x prop diameter)
> > 
> > The prop has a polar curve in effect with peak efficiency
> > occuring at a particular advance ratio - hence you have
> > climb props and cruise props.  The props are set to have
> > max propulsive efficiency at a particular advance ratio.
> > 
> > 
> > However at very low speeds we can say that the
> > realtionship between efficiency and advance ratio is
> > linear:
> > 
> > Prop efficiency = k x advance ratio = k x speed / (rpm x
> > prop diameter)
> > 
> > where k is the ratio between efficiency and advance ratio.
> > For a climb prop k may be around 1.43 or a little lower
> > depending on actual prop design.
> > 
> > So thrust available is now:
> > 
> > Thrust available = k x speed / (rpm x prop diameter) x
> > power / speed.
> > 
> > The speed now cancels out 
> > 
> > Thrust available = k x power / (rpm x prop diameter)
> > 
> > This is for low speed only.  As you speed up k decreases.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Let me rephrase the question, what is the conversion for
> > > thrust to horsepower assuming 0 airspeed, idea being
> > > what acceleration a jet powered glider will have from a
> > > standing start, ie takeoff?
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > 
> > > Dave
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > Behalf Of Anthony Smith
> > > Sent: Monday, 26 March 2007 7:50 AM
> > > To: 'Mike Cleaver'; 'Discussion of issues relating to
> > > Soaring in Australia.' Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] Jets
> > > 
> > > Actual Thrust = prop efficiency x power / speed.
> > > 
> > > Working out the prop efficiency is the interesting bit.
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Cleaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Sent: Sunday, 25 March 2007 10:32 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of issues
> > > relating to Soaring in Australia.
> > > Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] Jets
> > > 
> > > At 21:36 25/03/2007, you wrote:
> > > >Yes, but it isn't straightforward, which is why people
> > > keep refering to >either thrust for jets and horses for
> > > props. >
> > > >It is probably easier to convert horsepower to thrust -
> > > but you will >need a chart of your propeller efficiency.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >  Anyone know the relationship between thrust and
> > > horsepower?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The old Physics teacher in me (yes, me too!) says
> > > thrust = force
> > > work = force x distance
> > > speed = distance / time
> > > power = work / time = force x distance / time
> > > therefore power = thrust x speed
> > > 
> > > with appropriate factors to convert from various units,
> > > but if you  use the old imperial units then 1hp = 550
> > > ft-lbf/sec but then the aerodynamicists went and stuffed
> > > it all up by requiring  the density of air to be
> > > expressed in slugs per cubic foot to make  the imperial
> > > system work. (actually the error is using a pound as a 
> > > force unit when it is really a mass unit - a slug is
> > > 32.2 lb mass!) 
> > > Wombat
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Aus-soaring mailing list
> > > >Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> > > >To check or change subscription details, visit:
> > >
> > >
> > >http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soarin
> > > g 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aus-soaring mailing list
> > > Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> > > To check or change subscription details, visit:
> > >
> > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

ANDREW WRIGHT

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to