Hi, > On 30 Jul 2017, at 2:27 am, David Hooton <david.hoo...@ordnance.co> wrote: > > On 30/7/17, 6:37 am, "AusNOG on behalf of Matthew Moyle-Croft" > <ausnog-boun...@lists.ausnog.net on behalf of m...@mmc.com.au> wrote: > > Given the nature of users I don’t think a p95 number could be gamed > particularly, but it would ease some of the peaks a bit. > > The problem with this approach is that it assumes that NBN Co have the > available backhaul to carry the capacity they are selling. 95th percentile > charging is absolutely the right way to sell access to a network you want > users to consume freely, however that is not the current mandate they operate > under.
Not sure I quite follow that. Hiding behind CVC lack of scaling is obviously going to be revealed but I don’t see that it would change NBNCo costs significantly other than potentially to encourage them to scale earlier and in large amounts to ensure they can bill more. Hopefully a more virtuous cycle. MMC > > Dave _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
