Hi Phillip Thanks for that, from memory I already reached out to them the last time I mentioned this issue but I’ll try again.
Have a good day. Chris On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 10:22 am, Phillip Grasso <phillip.gra...@gmail.com> wrote: > suggest you work with The National Security Hotline (NSH) 1800 123 400. I > think that might be a better direction for your msg. > > On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 20:15, Chris Macko <chrismackozd...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> You do realise how easy it is to get ammonium nitrate in WA goldfields >> and even easier on Australian Opal fields? Not even requirements for cctv >> from governance bodies for storage locations so completely lack of regard >> for explosives security in that area exposed. >> >> Matey pull your finger maybe the little pinky and start taking this >> seriously. I’d hate for our stock market to take a crash just because China >> wanted a bit of backlash against us and America and found a gap within our >> technology layer on this front. >> >> Now wouldn’t that be an easy way to take control of our country? Forget >> about weapons of mass destruction one risk toppling all corporations in one >> foul swoop. >> >> No words from ASX lads? Or don’t they tune in to tech related network >> operators groups. Beware I’m sure that our Chinese friends are making calls >> right this instant as a result of these troubling factors. >> >> Christopher-Edward Macko >> >> On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 9:21 am, Mark Newton <new...@atdot.dotat.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 5 Sep 2019, at 11:55 PM, Chris Macko <chrismackozd...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Examples of this include TIA942 and the Uptime Institute specs >>> requiring bullet proof glass yet no one has a procedure to stop 1kg let >>> alone 100kg of servers filled with explosives from entering our data >>> centres disguised as normal server equipment within fully racks brought in >>> by clients during colo moves. >>> >>> That’s a bit of a movie-plot threat, though. >>> >>> If an adversary has reached the point where that’s a sensible tack for >>> them to take, I’m going to offer that nothing your company does is going to >>> be capable of stopping them because your imagination is unlikely to be as >>> good as theirs, and we’re well into the realm of heavy law enforcement or >>> light military response. >>> >>> I expect that most of this community’s denizens will find that they’re >>> protected from this (supposed) threat by being in multiple locations in any >>> case. Unless you’re going to up the movie plot stakes by saying the >>> adversary is in all of them at the same time. >>> >>> (Can I also point out that the threat posed by smuggled explosives is >>> indistinguishable from the threat posed by earthquake, flood, or fire, and >>> companies with business continuity plans capable of withstanding completely >>> predictable natural disasters have no need to invest additional stress into >>> dealing with the next Die Hard sequel? You’re either prepared or you >>> aren’t; And everyone already knows how to prepare, they just differ in how >>> much they want to spend doing it) >>> >>> - mark >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog