Morning Greg, 100% understandable about the standard profile which Is why we worked with support overnight and changed the link to Premium and get the same results as standard.
Single iPerf connections: Download: [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 127 MBytes 106 Mbits/sec 56 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 126 MBytes 106 Mbits/sec receiver Upload: [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 60.6 MBytes 50.9 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 60.5 MBytes 50.7 Mbits/sec receiver 8 iPerf connections: Download: [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 880 MBytes 738 Mbits/sec 618 sender [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 878 MBytes 736 Mbits/sec receiver Upload: [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 497 MBytes 417 Mbits/sec 0 sender [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 496 MBytes 416 Mbits/sec receiver While Generally the ole faithful Speedtest.net is poor measurement this does replicate the iperf results however with a margin of content filtering overhead: 1 Connection: DOWNLOAD Mbps: 74.09 UPLOAD Mbps: 42.06 8 Connections: DOWNLOAD Mbps: 527.46 UPLOAD Mbps: 252.76 Their official word is the RFC test does not support higher than 1gbps and they shared their interface configuration with me: XXXX-NTU-402# Running config. provision bw profile 10G_PRE_2000M_1:1_1600B_v3 cir 2g cbs 2000M color-mode aware-and-drop-red bw profile 10G_STD_2000M_0:1_v3 eir 2g ebs 1M color-mode aware-and-drop-red cfm profile CFM_EV_Profile lowest-alarm-prio rmep rfc2544 profile TDM_RFC2544_TPUT_TEST_D845114 protocol dmmY1731 type throughput *rate 1g <<<=limit for RFC testing only* duration 10 Waiting on a call back from their onshore Level 3 this morning as their Offshore team had not dealt with a EA 2gbps service before in the group that has been working the last few nights. On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:04 AM Greg Lipschitz < glipsch...@summitinternet.com.au> wrote: > Hi Cameron > > EA Standard offers no guarantee on available capacity. > > If you read the TSIS, they are very clear that the EA Standard service is > sold as 0:1 CIR:PIR (All EIR). > > So the lack of bandwidth at times does not surprise me in the slightest. > > The other thing they do say is that they will drop Standard CoS packets > before all other. > > If you don’t shape at both your aggregation port and the customer port, > you hit the Telstra policer, which is extremely aggressive on EA standard, > and they simply drop the packets causing a picket fencing effect on your > traffic. > > Telstra can do up to 10G with their RFC testing but they have a very > limited amount of equipment in Australia (the equipment is the size of a > very large desktop computer). > > Sing out if you need some more pointers. > > Cheers > Greg > > > > Greg Lipschitz​ | Founder & CEO | Summit Internet > *glipsch...@summitinternet.com.au* <glipsch...@summitinternet.com.au> > *summitinternet.com.au* <http://summitinternet.com.au> > *1300 049 749* <1300%20049%20749> > *Unit 2, 31-39 Norcal Road, Nunawading VIC 3131* > <https://www.google.com/maps?cid=12522583051503623677&_ga=2.149009334.1057584350.1554770858-1081443428.1554770858> > [image: Summit Internet] <http://summitinternet.com.au> > ------------------------------ > *From:* AusNOG <ausnog-boun...@lists.ausnog.net> on behalf of Chris > Kawchuk <ckawc...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, September 30, 2019 10:04:20 AM > *To:* Cameron Murray <cameron.mur...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* <ausnog@lists.ausnog.net> <ausnog@lists.ausnog.net> > *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Telstra EA 2gbps STD CoS - Experience > > Whats your burst-control values set to at either end? > > TelstraEA is pretty draconian on excess burst-to-line-rate overages on > sub-rate EVCs. If your token-buffers are too large, you'll get clipped by > an ingress policer at both ends. > > - CK. > > > > > On 30 Sep 2019, at 8:30 am, Cameron Murray <cameron.mur...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Morning, > > > > Wondered if anyone has had any experience with this type of service? > We've just installed our first since it was released in May and performance > is a mixed bag and Support have been little to no help as their RFC testing > does not go above 1gbps. > > > > We've seen latency change from .5ms from A > B to 3.2ms and single > thread TCP performance drop from 900/850 to the following testing with > iPerf: > > > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr > > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 159 MBytes 133 Mbits/sec 12 > sender > > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 159 MBytes 133 Mbits/sec > receiver > > > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr > > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 38.4 MBytes 32.2 Mbits/sec 0 > sender > > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 38.2 MBytes 32.1 Mbits/sec > receiver > > > > Before we modify the service to Premium I was hoping to get a benchmark. > > > > TIA. > > > > Cameron > > _______________________________________________ > > AusNOG mailing list > > AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net > > > https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ausnog.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fausnog&data=01%7C01%7Cglipschitz%40summitinternet.com.au%7C37eb0ea787c5493a4b2a08d7453ba817%7C0838a12f226e43dfa6e4bb63d2643a7e%7C1&sdata=ieTKbbGcPF6zt%2FfjJHT5HAo29guZKYVQnow0FABoC0c%3D&reserved=0 > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net > > https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ausnog.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fausnog&data=01%7C01%7Cglipschitz%40summitinternet.com.au%7C37eb0ea787c5493a4b2a08d7453ba817%7C0838a12f226e43dfa6e4bb63d2643a7e%7C1&sdata=ieTKbbGcPF6zt%2FfjJHT5HAo29guZKYVQnow0FABoC0c%3D&reserved=0 >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog