On 2017-04-25 16:00:54 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Vincent Lefevre <vincent-o...@vinc17.net> wrote: > > Only bash, ksh93 and zsh document what happens concerning SIGCHLD traps. > > Do you believe every shell should document SIGCHLD? > Wouldn't it be sufficient if SIGCHLD is handled the same way as > other signals?
Yes, this would be better. > Well, /bin/sleep 0.1 is definitely not portable, I used /bin/sleep 1 > instead... I mentioned the portability issue. You could replace it with a different command that takes a fraction of time. I used 0.1 instead of 1 because I didn't want to wait for 30 seconds (this was also an attempt to get different behaviors for the first values). > ksh93 delivers: > 0 > 1 > 2 > 2 > 2 > 2 > 2 > ^C Are you sure? Is there any reason why I don't get the same behavior with ksh93? > bash delivers: > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > ^C > > zsh delivers: > 0 > 7 > 30 > 30 > ^C > > which looks similar to what ksh93 does. Not with the above result you got. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
