>From the 2018-01-04 conference call, re Bug 1068: "We agree with the concept of using port 0 to get an ephemeral port may be done in a robust, portable, manner, but do not believe that it is appropriate for the Austin Group to define this behavior. This should be done by IETF/IANA and after they have adopted this behavior POSIX should then align with their standard. Probably the Internet Area Working Group: int-a...@ietf.org. (The Internet Area Working Group (INTAREA WG) acts primarily as a forum for discussing far-ranging topics that affect the entire area. Such topics include, for instance, address space issues, basic IP layer functionality, and architectural questions)." The issue has been left open pending action by IETF, is how things stand.If you set the View Issues list to show All Projects, Bug 1068 will appear; and may reappear in My View page. In a message dated 11/12/2018 10:32:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, danny...@hotmail.com writes:
There’s quite a lot of change and I couldn’t catch up. The “My View” section in the bug reporter no longer shows old bugs. I’d like to know how had we resolved the “binding to system-assigned port” bug, If we had resolved it. Thanks.
