> -----Original Message----- > From: Karstens, Nate <nate.karst...@garmin.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 12:26 AM > To: austin-group-l@opengroup.org > Subject: system() and pthread_atfork() > > The current definition of system() does not define if the pthread_atfork() > handlers are called. We ran into a > scenario where this caused a problem and wanted to share it with the mailing > list to better understand why those > handlers are not required and get some advice on how best to proceed. I think the right solution is for POSIX to require system() and popen() to call pthread_atfork() handlers. I haven't noticed any arguments against such a solution and it clearly fills a need. I suggest you open a corresponding defect report on http://austingroupbugs.net<http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1306>
