Yes, right-assoc does exist too, and the standard supports the DBCS varieties in charmaps as an election, even. There's also medials, which have left and right associativity, and a number of other types, depending on primary script family. I agree with your last point that such sequence conversions are plausible, it's just how has no portable specification currently, it is left as unspecified. On Friday, July 31, 2020 Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> wrote: shwaresyst wrote in <1371185781.9853799.1596158030...@mail.yahoo.com>: |It is not "some sensible \u sequences" alone. First off, there's little \ |agreement on what constitutes 'sensible'. Just the headache of the \ |U300 diacritics adds to XBD6 significantly, if they're to be supported, \ |as one example. The 'sensible' present solution is to not support them \ |at all; others will argue the 'sensible' thing is to support them because \ |Unocode does include these code points. The headache stems from it \ |is not simply arbitrarily saying let's have the utility support these \ |in $'', it's ensuring there are interfaces for the utilities to be \ |written in that understand left-associative combining sequences, and \
i think right-associative does also exist. I have long not worked with this stuff. |these interfaces are portable because requirements in XBD add that support. Please look at my former message. It stands that \Uu is ISO 10646, and that does not represent characters but codepoints, multiple of which may be necessary to represent one real character, which then may be a valid character in the locale encoding. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
