The following issue has been SUBMITTED. 
====================================================================== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1452 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                geoffclare
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2
Issue ID:                   1452
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Error
Severity:                   Objection
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Geoff Clare 
Organization:               The Open Group 
User Reference:              
Section:                    prs 
Page Number:                3120 
Line Number:                104398 
Interp Status:              --- 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2021-02-11 15:07 UTC
Last Modified:              2021-02-11 15:07 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    prs :KV: is mandated but most implementations do not
support it
Description: 
The prs page includes :KV: in the table of "SCCS File Data Keywords" that
can be used with the -d option.  However, the AIX, Solaris and CSSC prs
utilities do not recognise it (Solaris and CSSC output :KV: unaltered;
non-support on AIX is based on the online AIX man page). HP-UX is the only
implementation I could find that supports it, and it appears that all it
does is substitute :KV: with "none", so I suspect the only reason it
recognises the value is because it is listed in SUS.

The VSC test for this keyword says that it has not been implemented pending
interpretation VWG/065/011994.  So it seems that this is a known problem
that was first raised in 1994 but has persisted until now.  Unfortunately
that date (Jan 19, 1994) predates the start of the ogtgbase email archive,
and consequently I have been unable to find how that interpretation was
resolved.  Being 27 years old it probably doesn't affect how this should be
handled now anyway.

Desired Action: 
1. Issue a "defect case" interpretation.

2. Delete the :KV: row of the table:<blockquote>| :KV: | Keyword validation
string | " | text | S |</blockquote>

====================================================================== 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2021-02-11 15:07 geoffclare     New Issue                                    
2021-02-11 15:07 geoffclare     Name                      => Geoff Clare     
2021-02-11 15:07 geoffclare     Organization              => The Open Group  
2021-02-11 15:07 geoffclare     Section                   => prs             
2021-02-11 15:07 geoffclare     Page Number               => 3120            
2021-02-11 15:07 geoffclare     Line Number               => 104398          
2021-02-11 15:07 geoffclare     Interp Status             => ---             
======================================================================


  • [1003.1(2016... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to