A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=713 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                nsz
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1
Issue ID:                   713
Category:                   System Interfaces
Type:                       Omission
Severity:                   Editorial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Szabolcs Nagy 
Organization:               musl 
User Reference:              
Section:                    remquo 
Page Number:                 
Line Number:                 
Interp Status:              --- 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2013-06-18 00:00 UTC
Last Modified:              2021-04-15 09:08 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    in remquo quo should be unspecified when the result
is NaN
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0005317) geoffclare (manager) - 2021-04-15 09:08
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=713#c5317 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Re: https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=713#c5312 Yes it's implicitly
unspecified, but that's the point.
This bug is classed as editorial - it is pointing out that the wording is
inconsistent in that it calls out one special case as explicitly
unspecified and leaves the others as implicitly unspecified. It should
either call out all of these cases explicitly or none of them.

I think the reason we suggested you should refer this to the C committee is
purely as a courtesy in case they want to make an editorial improvement to
their wording too. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2013-06-18 00:00 nsz            New Issue                                    
2013-06-18 00:00 nsz            Name                      => Szabolcs Nagy   
2013-06-18 00:00 nsz            Organization              => musl            
2013-06-18 00:00 nsz            Section                   => remquo          
2013-06-20 15:54 nick           Tag Attached: c99                            
2021-04-14 15:01 nick           Note Added: 0005312                          
2021-04-14 15:23 kre            Note Added: 0005313                          
2021-04-14 15:28 kre            Note Added: 0005314                          
2021-04-15 09:08 geoffclare     Note Added: 0005317                          
======================================================================


  • [1003.1(2013... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re:... Fred J. Tydeman via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • tv_... Fred J. Tydeman via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • ... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to