The following issue has been SUBMITTED. 
====================================================================== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1679 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                gbrandenrobinson
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Issue 8 drafts
Issue ID:                   1679
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Clarification Requested
Severity:                   Editorial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       G. Branden RObinson 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
Section:                    msgfmt 
Page Number:                3166 
Line Number:                106937 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2023-04-21 10:00 UTC
Last Modified:              2023-04-21 10:00 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    strictly increasing order vs. monotonic
Description: 
"the application shall ensure that the statement containing the msgid
directive is immediately followed by a msgid_plural directive and that each
statement containing a msgid_plural directive is followed by count
statements containing msgstr[index] directives, starting with msgstr[0] and
ending with msgstr[count−1] in monotonically increasing order."

Shouldn't the requirement on the application be that it shall use a
_strictly_ increasing order?

If not, and if "monotonically" is truly meant, should something about which
statements with duplicate indices shall prevail?

My understanding is that in computer science applications, we can generally
read "monotonically increasing" as a synonym for "nondecreasing".  But
often what we mean is "strictly increasing".

Unfortunately I lack the training to venture an opinion on whether, say,
the Weierstrass function W(x) is monotonically increasing in the
neighborhood of x.  But I think I know enough to say that I'm sure I'd get
into trouble before properly studying real analysis.
Desired Action: 
Clarify for non-mathematicians, and those who gaze upon credentialed
mathematicians with envy.
====================================================================== 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2023-04-21 10:00 gbrandenrobinsonNew Issue                                    
2023-04-21 10:00 gbrandenrobinsonName                      => G. Branden
RObinson
2023-04-21 10:00 gbrandenrobinsonSection                   => msgfmt          
2023-04-21 10:00 gbrandenrobinsonPage Number               => 3166            
2023-04-21 10:00 gbrandenrobinsonLine Number               => 106937          
======================================================================


  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to