A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                calestyo
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Issue 8 drafts
Issue ID:                   1771
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Enhancement Request
Severity:                   Editorial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Christoph Anton Mitterer 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
Section:                    Utilities / printf 
Page Number:                3269 
Line Number:                111019 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2023-08-07 19:22 UTC
Last Modified:              2023-08-08 14:28 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    support or reserve %q as printf-utility format
specifier
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0006420) calestyo (reporter) - 2023-08-08 14:28
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771#c6420 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
A I see... lower case letters for conversion specifiers are apparently
reserved for future use in 7.31.11 Input/output <stdio.h>.

But POSIX already specifies %b for the printf utility, and on a quick
search I couldn't find any reference in the C standard that this would be
reserved.
Also there seem to be other (lower case) conversion specifiers, not
standardised but still used by implementations (sigh), e.g.
glib/uClibc/musl have: 'm'


Well %Q is already used by bash as follows:
> %Q  like %q, but applies any supplied precision to the argument
>     before quoting it.

But I guess that would be still compatible with %q.
GNU printf does not seem to use %Q.

%q is probably already used in many real world scripts... not sure how easy
it would be to have the C folks exclude q (and perhaps also b) from their
reservation? 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       New Issue                                    
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       Name                      => Christoph Anton
Mitterer
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       Section                   => Utilities / printf
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       Page Number               => 3269            
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       Line Number               => 111019          
2023-08-07 19:36 chet_ramey     Note Added: 0006416                          
2023-08-07 19:46 calestyo       Note Added: 0006417                          
2023-08-07 23:39 salewski       Issue Monitored: salewski                    
2023-08-08 08:46 geoffclare     Note Added: 0006418                          
2023-08-08 14:28 calestyo       Note Added: 0006420                          
======================================================================


  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [Issue ... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to