Hi, On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 10:36:11PM +0000, Austin Group Issue Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: > I think "-q" should be standardized. It's widely supported, and most > importantly, it's already in use in scripts.
We'd need to clarify the semantics of -q. Does it silence all errors, or only some? Do all implementations behave in the same way? Also, many scripts need not be portable and use vendor extensions. > In many cases it doesn't matter > *why* it failed, it failed. That's true of many commands, not just mktemp(1). And for all commands, 2>/dev/null already works. Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
