All
Enclosed are the minutes from this weeks call
regards
Andrew
-----------------

Minutes of the 5th June 2025 Teleconference    Austin-1458 Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group.        7th June 2025

Attendees:
    Andrew Josey, The Open Group (partial)
    Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 OR
    Geoff Clare, The Open Group
    Haelwenn Monnier, The Open Group
    Mark Brown
    Eric Blake, Red Hat, The Open Group OR

Apologies
    Eric Ackermann, CISPA

* General business

We confirmed the calendar for upcoming meetings, 
the next meeting is June 12th, followed by June 19th.

Andrew noted he has provided the files as requeste for the IEEE PSDO
submission and that was in process.


* Open Business

Bug 1876: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a   OPEN
context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1876

Andrew took an action to ask shell developers to comment on this
issue.  (completed by sending an email to the reflector:
austin-group-l:archive/latest/37925).

Bug 864: Insufficient specification of storage requirements for synchronization 
objects
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=864

AI: Andrew to contact Rich Felker to determine whether or not items
1 an 4 have been resolved by section 2.9.9 and to get suggested
wording for changes to address items 2 and 3.  The action was
completed, but no response received as yet.


Bug 1904: LC_TIME era start_date (and end_date) possibly mis-specified
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1904
This was discussed during the 2025-02-13 meeting:
    Historically, there was no year 0 and the standard is worded
    to reflect this fact.  Is this what implementation actually do?

Andrew had completed an action to ask for input on what other
implementations do and some feedback has been received so need to
return to this on a future call.


* Current Business



Bug 1924: New word splitting requirements inappropriate in locales with 
non-self-synchronising character encodings  
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1924
Previously resolved as: Accepted as marked, resolved, tc1-2024 tag

Reopened.

We revisited this bug as Bugnotes 7186, 7187, 7188, 7189, 7190 &
7191 were added after this bug was resolved.

In the June 5, 2025 teleconference the issues raised since the
original resolution were discussed. The following is a new proposed
resolution but the issue is being left open for feedback.

After page 79 line 2388 section 3 Definitions, add:

3.328 Self-synchronizing Character Encoding

    A character encoding in which no contiguous subset (other than
    the encoding of each character) of bytes from the encoding of
    any one character or two adjacent characters can also represent
    the encoding of any valid character on its own.

and renumber the later subsections.

On page 120 line 3840 section 6.2, change:

    Likewise, the byte values used to encode <period>, <slash>,
    <newline>, and <carriage-return> shall not occur as part of any
    other character in any locale.
to:
    Likewise, the byte values used to encode <newline>, <carriage-return>,
    <tab>, <space>, <hyphen-minus>, <period>, <slash>, and <colon>
    shall not occur as part of any other character in any locale.


On page 2481 line 80454 section 2.5.3 Shell Variables (IFS), after:
    If the value of IFS includes any bytes that do not form part
    of a valid character, the results of field splitting, expansion
    of '*', and use of the read utility are unspecified.

add a sentence:
    If the current locale's character encoding is not self-synchronizing
    and the value of IFS includes any character for which the byte
    encoding can overlap with the byte encoding of any other sequence
    of characters, the results of field splitting, expansion of
    '*', and use of the read utility are unspecified.

and two small-font notes:
    <small>Note: The UTF-8 encoding is self-synchronizing, meaning
    that no character's encoding can be confused with any other
    sequence of characters, and thus all characters are safe to use
    in IFS when the current locale uses this encoding.</small>

    <small>Note: [xref to XBD 6.2 Character Encoding] specifies a
    set of characters from the portable character set whose byte
    values are not allowed to occur as part of any other character
    in any locale. These characters are safe to use in IFS with any
    locale.</small>


Bug 1926: Nobody has mistaken bytes for bits when deciding value for 
GETENTROPY_MAX do we?
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1926
Open.

Next Steps 

We will start on bug 1926 next time 

The next calls are on
    Thu 2025-06-12 (WEBEX meeting - general bugs)
    Thu 2025-06-19 (WEBEX meeting - general bugs)

The calls are for 90 minutes

Calls are anchored on US time. (8am Pacific)


Please check the calendar invites for dial in details.

Bugs are at:
https://austingroupbugs.net

An etherpad is usually up for the meeting, with a URL using the date
format as below:

https://posix.rhansen.org/p/20xx-mm-dd

(For write access this uses The Open Group single sign on,
for those individuals with gitlab.opengroup.org accounts.
Please contact Andrew if you need to be setup)

--------
Andrew Josey                    The Open Group
Austin Group Chair          
Email: [email protected] 
Apex Plaza, Forbury Road,Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England

To learn how we maintain your privacy, please review The Open Group Privacy 
Statement at http://www.opengroup.org/privacy.
To unsubscribe/opt-out from this mailing list login to The Open Group 
collaboration portal at
https://collaboration.opengroup.org/operational/portal.php?action=unsub&listid=2481





Reply via email to