All
Enclosed are the minutes of this weeks call.
regards
Andrew
------------------
Minutes of the 15th January 2026 Teleconference Austin-1476 Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 16th January 2026

Attendees:
Andrew Josey,The Open Group 
Haelwenn Monnier, The Open Group
Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 OR (partial)
Geoff Clare, The Open Group
Eric Ackermann, CISPA
Eric Blake, Red Hat, The Open Group OR
Mark Brown (partial)
Mark Ziegast, ShWare Systems

* General business

We confirmed the calendar for upcoming meetings, the next meeting
is January 22nd 2026

Andrew noted that he had attended the IEEE MSC meeting and had
mentioned the vacancy for the IEEE Organizational representative.
Andrew will take an action to review the IEEE ballot pool to see
if we can identify a candidate (the candidate needs to be 
a technical expert who is an IEEE member).


* New Business

Bug 1965: Why isn't pthread_equal async-signal safe?
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1965
Accepted as marked, interp required, tc1-2024 tag

Marked MT-Safe on linux and on illumos, no information on {Free,Net,Open}BSD 
and macOS, AIX just recommends to not use == as pthread_t is an opaque type.

Interpretation response:
The standard states that pthread_equal() need not be async-signal-safe,
and conforming applications must conform to this. However, concerns
have been raised about this which are being referred to the sponsor.

Rationale:
It is believed that no pthread interfaces were required to be
async-signal-safe in the original POSIX.1c threads amendment because
the standard allowed implementations to define pthread_t as a
structure type. However, now that the standard requires pthread_kill()
to be async-signal-safe, any such implementation would need a way
to pass a pthread_t structure to pthread_kill() in an async-signal-safe
manner and thus would be able to use the same method to pass a
pthread_t to pthread_equal().

Notes to the Editor (not part of this interpretation):
Add pthread_equal() to the list of async-signal-safe functions.


Bug 1966: Current/previous job definition scattered and ambiguous OPEN
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1966


* Next Steps

We will start at bug 1966 next time.

Bugs to return to, bugs 1949, 1616, 1941.

The next call is on
Thu 2026-01-22 (WEBEX meeting - general bugs)

Apologies in advance:
Geoff Clare 2026-01-29

The calls are for 90 minutes

Calls are anchored on US time. (8am Pacific)


Please check the calendar invites for dial in details.

Bugs are at:
https://austingroupbugs.net

An etherpad is usually up for the meeting, with a URL using the date
format as below:

https://posix.rhansen.org/p/20xx-mm-dd

(For write access this uses The Open Group single sign on,
for those individuals with gitlab.opengroup.org accounts.
Please contact Andrew if you need to be setup)


--------
Andrew Josey                    The Open Group
Austin Group Chair          
Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Apex Plaza, Forbury Road,Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England

To learn how we maintain your privacy, please review The Open Group Privacy 
Statement at http://www.opengroup.org/privacy.
To unsubscribe/opt-out from this mailing list login to The Open Group 
collaboration portal at
https://collaboration.opengroup.org/operational/portal.php?action=unsub&listid=2481




Reply via email to