Hi, Ben. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9704 Thank you! RFC Editor/lb > On Jan 13, 2025, at 12:53 PM, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I approve this version for publication. > > --Ben SchwartzFrom: Lynne Bartholomew <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 1:23 PM > To: Ben Schwartz <[email protected]>; Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> > Cc: Ben Schwartz <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]>; [email protected]<[email protected]>; > [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; > [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9704 > <draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-14> for your review > > > Hi, Ben and Éric. > > Ben, we have further updated this document per your note below. > > Éric, we have noted your approval for the updates to Section 7 on the AUTH48 > status page: > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9704__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rF6BxdSJo$ > > The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.txt__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFUwumy4c$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.pdf__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFxvVjZYc$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFJpa7HGE$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.xml__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFC_RLrzI$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-diff.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rF0ZGsscQ$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-rfcdiff.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFI-ckS2U$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-auth48diff.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFDNfz278$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastdiff.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFcSp9qHo$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastrfcdiff.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rF22zqEzc$ > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff1.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFni2Hqgg$ > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff2.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!8cQ0_W5U9y_XQABOcHliF8tMjte6PBzpwDjNGi7MrIATIkeZI94dHOhmYvR20Ds-s_8u8qGk2QQcrC64w5rFAW8kBLk$ > > > Thank you! > > RFC Editor/lb > > > > On Jan 10, 2025, at 8:24 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Hello Lynne, > > The changes in section 7 are indeed borderline between technical and > > editorial, but they respect my view of the IETF/ADD WG consensus. I.e., I > > approve these changes. > > Regards > > -éric > > > On Jan 10, 2025, at 7:31 AM, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Section 2: > > >> > > >> OLD: > > >> Validated Split Horizon: Indicates that a split-horizon > > >> configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the > > >> client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized > > >> this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. > > >> > > >> NEW: > > >> Validated Split Horizon: A split-horizon > > >> configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the > > >> client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized > > >> this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. > > > > > [rfced] We added the word "that" in order to keep the sentence-fragment > > > style used in all four list items. Please let us know > if you would > > > prefer your complete-sentence style for all four items. > > > > Sentence-fragment style is fine, but I find the adjusted text hard to > > parse. Let's try this change: > > > > OLD: > > A split-horizon configuration that for some name is considered "validated" > > if the client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized this > > resolver to serve its own responses for that name. > > > > NEW: > > A split-horizon configuration that is authorized by the parents of the > > affected names and confirmed by the client. > > > > --Ben -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
