Greetings, [Please note the new email address on our end.]
A friendly reminder that this document set awaits author attention. 1) We are awaiting responses to document-specific author queries and updates from your reviews. Please see our document-specific emails for further information and reply in those threads. 2) Note also that we are awaiting further guidance as to which action to take regarding this from Jonathan in response to our cluster-wide queries in this email thread: > > On Nov 7, 2024, at 7:51 AM, Jonathan Lennox > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2) Please review the way bit names are treated throughout the cluster. >> Sometimes the >> names of the bits are included in parentheses (e.g., "the I (Independent >> Frame) and >> D (Discardable Frame) bits"), sometimes a pointer is given on where to see >> more about >> the bit (e.g., "B bit (described below"), sometimes the bit names are not >> included at >> all (e.g., "the D bit"), and sometimes we see the letters in quotes (e.g., >> the "D" bit). >> >> We suggest making these uses uniform and/or explaining them in one place and >> pointing the >> reader there for more information upon introduction of the bit in the >> document. Upon careful >> review, please let us know what updates are necessary using Old/New or by >> updating the XML >> files as necessary. > > That sounds good. 3) Further note: We have received bounce-message notifications for Justin Uberti and Danny Hong on at least one email address listed. Could they each respond confirming receipt and letting us know how their contact information should appear in the documents themselves? Please see the AUTH48 status page for this cluster at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C324 Thank you. RFC Editor/mf > On Nov 13, 2024, at 1:34 PM, Megan Ferguson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jonathan, > > Thank you for your reply. > > Regarding the following question, please clarify how you would like us to > update or if you are planning to update the file yourself. > > RFC Editor/mf > > >> On Nov 7, 2024, at 7:51 AM, Jonathan Lennox >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 2) Please review the way bit names are treated throughout the cluster. >>> Sometimes the >>> names of the bits are included in parentheses (e.g., "the I (Independent >>> Frame) and >>> D (Discardable Frame) bits"), sometimes a pointer is given on where to see >>> more about >>> the bit (e.g., "B bit (described below"), sometimes the bit names are not >>> included at >>> all (e.g., "the D bit"), and sometimes we see the letters in quotes (e.g., >>> the "D" bit). >>> >>> We suggest making these uses uniform and/or explaining them in one place >>> and pointing the >>> reader there for more information upon introduction of the bit in the >>> document. Upon careful >>> review, please let us know what updates are necessary using Old/New or by >>> updating the XML >>> files as necessary. >> >> That sounds good. > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
