On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:28 PM Jiankang Yao <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > *From:* Alice Russo <[email protected]> > *Date:* 2025-02-28 00:02 > *To:* resnick <[email protected]>; Jiankang Yao <[email protected]>; Arnt > Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> > *CC:* Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]>; Bron Gondwana > <[email protected]>; extra-ads <[email protected]>; extra-chairs > <[email protected]>; RFC Editor <[email protected]>; > auth48archive <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9755 <draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-04> for > your review > > > >> 5) <!--[rfced] In general in RFCs, the term "MIME type" > >> should be "media type". Please review whether these updates > >> convey the intended meaning. > >> > >> a new MIME type -> a new media type > >> > >> the MIME structure of a message > >> -> the media type of the body of a message > >> --> > > > > My understanding is that "MIME type" is better than "media type" in the > document. > > Why is "MIME type" better than "media type"? The former is the older name for the same thing; the latter is the preferred term. -MSK
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
