Hi Alanna--
Thanks for the heads-up! I'll hold off on updating the artwork in
RFC-to-be 9788, as requested, until i hear back from you.
Thanks for your attention to these documents!
--dkg
On Wed 2025-07-02 15:30:27 -0700, Alanna Paloma wrote:
> Hi DKG,
>
> Apologies for the delay. Your suggestion to update xml2rfc is being actively
> considered.
>
> Please hold off on updating the artwork in RFC-to-be 9788 until a decision
> has been made.
>
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
>
>> On Jul 2, 2025, at 2:57 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri 2025-06-27 22:19:31 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> I propose replacing ↧ and ⇩ with symbols from the BOX DRAWINGS range
>>> instead.
>>>
>>> The attached proposed XML file makes this substitution for the MIME tree
>>> diagrams. It will still render as misaligned, however, as long as the
>>> fix [0] is not applied to xml2rfc.
>>>
>>> If you think this is reasonable, let me know and i can try to make a
>>> comparable revision for RFC 9788.
>>
>> So far i've only heard back from Bernie about this change to the
>> codepoints used in the "ascii-art" MIME diagrams (and he approves).
>> Doing the same work for RFC-to-be 9788 is more substantial (because of
>> all the test vectors) but i'm inclined to go ahead and do it anyway in
>> the hopes that there will be no objections.
>>
>> If anyone is inclined to contest this change, please let me know so i
>> don't waste my time fixing up the other draft!
>>
>> And, if the RFC editor approves, i encourage you to update the xml
>> published at https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml too.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --dkg
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
