Hi Eliot,

Thank you!
Sarah Tarrant
RFC Production Center

> On Sep 12, 2025, at 1:54 AM, Eliot Lear (elear) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> No updates necessary. Please proceed. 
> 
> Eliot
> 
>> On 5 Sep 2025, at 16:34, Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Eliot,
>> 
>> Sounds good! We will look out for that during AUTH48.
>> 
>> In the meantime, we will await response to the other questions for the 
>> document intake process.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Sarah Tarrant
>> RFC Production Center
>> 
>>> On Sep 5, 2025, at 12:23 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Greetings, Sarah!
>>> 
>>>>> On 4 Sep 2025, at 23:43, Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Author(s),
>>>> 
>>>> Congratulations, your document has been successfully added to the RFC 
>>>> Editor queue!
>>>> The team at the RFC Production Center (RPC) is looking forward to working 
>>>> with you
>>>> as your document moves forward toward publication. To help reduce 
>>>> processing time
>>>> and improve editing accuracy, please respond to the questions below. 
>>>> Please confer
>>>> with your coauthors (or authors of other documents if your document is in a
>>>> cluster) as necessary prior to taking action in order to streamline 
>>>> communication.
>>>> If your document has multiple authors, only one author needs to reply to 
>>>> this
>>>> message.
>>>> 
>>>> As you read through the rest of this email:
>>>> 
>>>> * If you need/want to make updates to your document, we encourage you to 
>>>> make those
>>>> changes and resubmit to the Datatracker. This allows for the easy creation 
>>>> of diffs,
>>>> which facilitates review by interested parties (e.g., authors, ADs, doc 
>>>> shepherds).
>>> 
>>> We may need to add one name to the acknowledgments, but I would prefer to 
>>> hold this off til AUTH48.
>>> 
>>>> * If you feel no updates to the document are necessary, please reply with 
>>>> any
>>>> applicable rationale/comments.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> See above.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Eliot
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Please note that the RPC team will not work on your document until we hear 
>>>> from you
>>>> (that is, your document will remain in AUTH state until we receive a 
>>>> reply). Even
>>>> if you don't have guidance or don't feel that you need to make any updates 
>>>> to the
>>>> document, you need to let us know. After we hear from you, your document 
>>>> will start
>>>> moving through the queue. You will be able to review and approve our 
>>>> updates
>>>> during AUTH48.
>>>> 
>>>> Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have at
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> The RPC Team
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> 1) As there may have been multiple updates made to the document during 
>>>> Last Call,
>>>> please review the current version of the document:
>>>> 
>>>> * Is the text in the Abstract is still accurate?
>>>> * Are the References, Authors' Addresses, Contributors, and Acknowledgments
>>>> sections current?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2) Please share any style information that could help us with editing your
>>>> document. For example:
>>>> 
>>>> * Is your document's format or its terminology based on another document?
>>>> If so, please provide a pointer to that document (e.g., this document's
>>>> terminology should match DNS terminology in RFC 9499).
>>>> * Is there a pattern of capitalization or formatting of terms? (e.g., 
>>>> field names
>>>> should have initial capitalization; parameter names should be in double 
>>>> quotes;
>>>> <tt/> should be used for token names; etc.)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 3) Is there any text that should be handled extra cautiously? For example, 
>>>> are
>>>> there any sections that were contentious when the document was drafted?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 4) Is there anything else that the RPC should be aware of while editing 
>>>> this
>>>> document?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 5) This document uses one or more of the following text styles.
>>>> Are these elements used consistently?
>>>> 
>>>> * fixed width font (<tt/> or `)
>>>> * italics (<em/> or *)
>>>> * bold (<strong/> or **)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 6) This document contains sourcecode:
>>>> 
>>>> * Does the sourcecode validate?
>>>> * Some sourcecode types (e.g., YANG) require certain references and/or text
>>>> in the Security Considerations section. Is this information correct?
>>>> * Is the sourcecode type indicated in the XML? (see information about
>>>> sourcecode types).
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 7) This document contains SVG. The RPC cannot update SVG diagrams, so 
>>>> please
>>>> ensure that:
>>>> 
>>>> * the SVG figures match the ASCII art used in the text output as closely as
>>>> possible, and
>>>> * the figures fit on the pages of the PDF output.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 8) Would you like to participate in the RPC Pilot Test for editing in 
>>>> kramdown-rfc?
>>>> If so, please let us know and provide a self-contained kramdown-rfc file. 
>>>> For more
>>>> information about this experiment, see:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_kramdown_rfc.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 4, 2025, at 4:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Author(s),
>>>>> 
>>>>> Your document draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18, which has been approved 
>>>>> for publication as
>>>>> an RFC, has been added to the RFC Editor queue
>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php>.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If your XML file was submitted using the I-D submission tool
>>>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/>, we have already retrieved it
>>>>> and have started working on it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you did not submit the file via the I-D submission tool, or
>>>>> if you have an updated version (e.g., updated contact information),
>>>>> please send us the file at this time by attaching it
>>>>> in your reply to this message and specifying any differences
>>>>> between the approved I-D and the file that you are providing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You will receive a separate message from us asking for style input.
>>>>> Please respond to that message.  When we have received your response,
>>>>> your document will then move through the queue. The first step that
>>>>> we take as your document moves through the queue is converting it to
>>>>> RFCXML (if it is not already in RFCXML) and applying the formatting
>>>>> steps listed at <https://www.rfc-editor.org/pubprocess/how-we-update/>.
>>>>> Next, we will edit for clarity and apply the style guide
>>>>> (<https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/>).
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can check the status of your document at
>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php>.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You will receive automatic notifications as your document changes
>>>>> queue state (for more information about these states, please see
>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/about/queue/>). When we have completed
>>>>> our edits, we will move your document to AUTH48 state and ask you
>>>>> to perform a final review of the document.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The RFC Editor Team
>> 
>> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to