Hi Valery, The double "with" doesn't ring any editorial alarm bells for me, so I updated to "If the responder is configured with a PPK with an ID".
And we will make a note about this draft and draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-23 being published together, with each others' RFC numbers. That shouldn't need a cluster construction. Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. The updated files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9867.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9867.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9867.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9867.xml The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9867-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9867-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes only) Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the most recent version. For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9867 Thank you, Sarah Tarrant RFC Production Center > On Sep 23, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Valery Smyslov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If the responder is configured with a PPK -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
