Hi Sarah, Unless you can tell us of a more appropriate type for CBOR EDN, we believe cbor-diag is correct for these figures.
Best, Antoine ________________________________ From: Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2025 17:38 To: Antoine Delignat-Lavaud <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Cedric Fournet <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-17> [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hi Antoine, Thank you for your reply. Regarding: >> 6) This document contains sourcecode: >> >> * Does the sourcecode validate? > > Yes, the source code is either EDN (automatically generated) or CDDL > (validates). The following figures are currently set to type "cbor-diag": Figure 2: An example COSE Signature with multiple receipts Figure 6: Receipt of Inclusion igure 9: Example consistency receipt Is this still correct? Thank you, Sarah Tarrant RFC Production Center > On Sep 23, 2025, at 10:32 AM, Antoine Delignat-Lavaud <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 6) This document contains sourcecode: > > * Does the sourcecode validate? > > Yes, the source code is either EDN (automatically generated) or CDDL > (validates).
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
