I approve.

Thanks
Gautam

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 9:53 AM Carroll, William <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I approve.
>
> Thanks!
> William Carroll
>
> On 9/24/25, 12:16 PM, "Alanna Paloma" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
> Hi Scott,
>
>
> Thank you for your reply. We have updated as requested.
>
>
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WrSqus0q8hfExfrjM0MGQ5tqyXUSqVXDhiwwMhZSqX_zGFCV4iDu89kn677dby8e2Jve4HkGzljsdYH7Sm0bpbxkHlYKxAzZ4LIcKV64OLicV7n9JZebhiG17QwhK1d8sNPTD1mMwwnksc9NsZc1qGRlFJfzgUlZ582o3KlBOoiZ2Bkk17sl0ImZ3Ha18Q_oQPhWOXOxoo0xFCMbyai5LzqbiXuxOy5rTPbqNcWGjpwucf2XMJMaOU88VZ2w07wjP-LctvKadaFL3KTCrhMtRkT6D6FUAKBSIJi-pl1xJec/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874.xml
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WrSqus0q8hfExfrjM0MGQ5tqyXUSqVXDhiwwMhZSqX_zGFCV4iDu89kn677dby8e2Jve4HkGzljsdYH7Sm0bpbxkHlYKxAzZ4LIcKV64OLicV7n9JZebhiG17QwhK1d8sNPTD1mMwwnksc9NsZc1qGRlFJfzgUlZ582o3KlBOoiZ2Bkk17sl0ImZ3Ha18Q_oQPhWOXOxoo0xFCMbyai5LzqbiXuxOy5rTPbqNcWGjpwucf2XMJMaOU88VZ2w07wjP-LctvKadaFL3KTCrhMtRkT6D6FUAKBSIJi-pl1xJec/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874.xml
> >
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ruD9qgwzjbyKmv2l-XzVoY1Z0QGjVUtSqzZB-esGQX4Yo2OR-tVDZH6FnBdaGEFf8sEf4X7FyCSwa4T9iNdmELZWk-8CRQP4fwCxUqbYZZs5_e2wRq2o4Da_WZFP15ZJE2VQIpKUk3iXUjLsV-Gv5jjYldH1gNhfJeGXnCw4Xt4Hhs3UX0da3XrRn8GnbNo09yBQyjIzKDzrkdnch2mNkFuhDLYOE7LKPHetiMH52xbAFJuGitx25z-JMg_y9nlWwA2r7w7QHwvDKKHptk24UiMwKBoSOV_zpPcWcDd7TDE/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874.txt
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ruD9qgwzjbyKmv2l-XzVoY1Z0QGjVUtSqzZB-esGQX4Yo2OR-tVDZH6FnBdaGEFf8sEf4X7FyCSwa4T9iNdmELZWk-8CRQP4fwCxUqbYZZs5_e2wRq2o4Da_WZFP15ZJE2VQIpKUk3iXUjLsV-Gv5jjYldH1gNhfJeGXnCw4Xt4Hhs3UX0da3XrRn8GnbNo09yBQyjIzKDzrkdnch2mNkFuhDLYOE7LKPHetiMH52xbAFJuGitx25z-JMg_y9nlWwA2r7w7QHwvDKKHptk24UiMwKBoSOV_zpPcWcDd7TDE/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874.txt
> >
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1gujmj7Uwu-iJtvEtB-ECfdovnxjPv3fKkdbPjYbUkphBLFcH4wjDcgfmddlgkEhgMrnL2wpdWiRn6QzwGeE5nHa66qAk8QcqCnoR_7v1QWI_oeXMe4bsb7xhXl0Xl5rUdPK46xAK0ubVMGP5_ztXcLRE0aavIpjFuLDgOk9a8PR4czPa_1_O7YJ6ijKpOiB39hXdOz2So9Gnm90r9isDt2hyBsf4O-b191dKdx0A-wiiu8BZjMRBRDwiLyEtrI8m6vnAafPC3sbuMPML1ac9CVK7Pg1ii56gGw9v7yd-sJ8/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874.html
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1gujmj7Uwu-iJtvEtB-ECfdovnxjPv3fKkdbPjYbUkphBLFcH4wjDcgfmddlgkEhgMrnL2wpdWiRn6QzwGeE5nHa66qAk8QcqCnoR_7v1QWI_oeXMe4bsb7xhXl0Xl5rUdPK46xAK0ubVMGP5_ztXcLRE0aavIpjFuLDgOk9a8PR4czPa_1_O7YJ6ijKpOiB39hXdOz2So9Gnm90r9isDt2hyBsf4O-b191dKdx0A-wiiu8BZjMRBRDwiLyEtrI8m6vnAafPC3sbuMPML1ac9CVK7Pg1ii56gGw9v7yd-sJ8/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874.html
> >
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1A5q7gJEahRRSR3ogzzkTB1L_4Llm--Us0q9fmwPNFFQGRoqdN5Kh7hzsfymCJH9Lcnh1vo8ss7NqSgAfJStdUloe5stNyzuAmZcdgOMwL3pwBQLy_bYAdPPsKoWjppqksZ0zMv6Vg6eOYf4ASi79RD7npxKwcf1apZ9JMWTxeuyc0J345gaIKUmJUXrJWXFFVw06LG5Po4MW2OvhlrJkPJKDgpeRlZUrbb0PSmBJtbRdYbNQXwbW4hXOAGsofKHuPdKbAtHrLO_MyY6c7QITQfy2yQ2bHCLInnyLtxnabZM/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874.pdf
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1A5q7gJEahRRSR3ogzzkTB1L_4Llm--Us0q9fmwPNFFQGRoqdN5Kh7hzsfymCJH9Lcnh1vo8ss7NqSgAfJStdUloe5stNyzuAmZcdgOMwL3pwBQLy_bYAdPPsKoWjppqksZ0zMv6Vg6eOYf4ASi79RD7npxKwcf1apZ9JMWTxeuyc0J345gaIKUmJUXrJWXFFVw06LG5Po4MW2OvhlrJkPJKDgpeRlZUrbb0PSmBJtbRdYbNQXwbW4hXOAGsofKHuPdKbAtHrLO_MyY6c7QITQfy2yQ2bHCLInnyLtxnabZM/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874.pdf
> >
>
>
> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1zeFDkF0MujugAqMXMIhLaol7Q24HwYyfpC-3TSHWOHTU2P7lCl2c_kBmFTzrgdeEK0A7bZYS3osDux8YcLAYqg-FnGfqCL2oBgyoM0Qahis1NEhqfBDRLQufO-YxQAFKfkPugx3_4rTyi4knkndxdMzciMRHgE1m7q6HlYIIkrDy1o71IphNEw0ekTsyojJXpRVaX7Gg_H84oN2I0ZRc0COen0m2DRDQtisHSHRh7ytJH6E4O5ZzI9IO7NT3hn58c0dUUAk2exC9sb4NUCq-czLAZhmfNPICWt5BniuL8j4/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874-diff.html
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1zeFDkF0MujugAqMXMIhLaol7Q24HwYyfpC-3TSHWOHTU2P7lCl2c_kBmFTzrgdeEK0A7bZYS3osDux8YcLAYqg-FnGfqCL2oBgyoM0Qahis1NEhqfBDRLQufO-YxQAFKfkPugx3_4rTyi4knkndxdMzciMRHgE1m7q6HlYIIkrDy1o71IphNEw0ekTsyojJXpRVaX7Gg_H84oN2I0ZRc0COen0m2DRDQtisHSHRh7ytJH6E4O5ZzI9IO7NT3hn58c0dUUAk2exC9sb4NUCq-czLAZhmfNPICWt5BniuL8j4/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874-diff.html>
> (comprehensive diff)
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1NZtcapPgfCe29-VGY3GsKu0BJU2QAnwq0e7ojkJmqZEw182Tm-X_cO-ADJ4bxaEo1O71n7C2zlU2tCrgIEGHA8imBuY_jESQ3Zkk-67qOE5nyLUge0BzPXIKGn9CSBv_1AEY8APlVeiQmcsY2L5YNQfAlXQQ2XkvKVtM7Rq3LA8xE7oGs-rFxtoBhtMJZoe8ftnJBbT4uqUDHxWPr9xySZNlHe8yGqPa1WicgIeWCJ4NyIhHIKePRLirnIkSkyvcbTN-ffTMN6fg6nIEgNSY8Hz0Gj2DmEktnNcd-bNvMek/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874-auth48diff.html
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1NZtcapPgfCe29-VGY3GsKu0BJU2QAnwq0e7ojkJmqZEw182Tm-X_cO-ADJ4bxaEo1O71n7C2zlU2tCrgIEGHA8imBuY_jESQ3Zkk-67qOE5nyLUge0BzPXIKGn9CSBv_1AEY8APlVeiQmcsY2L5YNQfAlXQQ2XkvKVtM7Rq3LA8xE7oGs-rFxtoBhtMJZoe8ftnJBbT4uqUDHxWPr9xySZNlHe8yGqPa1WicgIeWCJ4NyIhHIKePRLirnIkSkyvcbTN-ffTMN6fg6nIEgNSY8Hz0Gj2DmEktnNcd-bNvMek/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874-auth48diff.html>
> (AUTH48 changes)
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1uE8uhR0G3PllSIgpKKvsx60-7UmIqc7WDqSCsB5PFsUQYC4jblXZHGTF72hi3ri5ik1Mn2FapRY2ZHZD9gVX6NPdFvWlST45_RWaF2z5t7Xrs2r4s5t3QEfr3cNXC2FelIp1SctZSqvmssMhGmBVTHZnZxI8P10Paznq0fJNqfl5aOO3XtuxkIXtmVF9zokh4jd3wNycSH8epGTUqtppB_cRMgcXRRndDQeSxMHzaF1rhgWAzqloZGY4SCcdpxAnj7087FPZiDvcGmMeJ8p_Gyqw1T8fJCzcV3rNN1CmaOM/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874-auth48rfcdiff.html
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1uE8uhR0G3PllSIgpKKvsx60-7UmIqc7WDqSCsB5PFsUQYC4jblXZHGTF72hi3ri5ik1Mn2FapRY2ZHZD9gVX6NPdFvWlST45_RWaF2z5t7Xrs2r4s5t3QEfr3cNXC2FelIp1SctZSqvmssMhGmBVTHZnZxI8P10Paznq0fJNqfl5aOO3XtuxkIXtmVF9zokh4jd3wNycSH8epGTUqtppB_cRMgcXRRndDQeSxMHzaF1rhgWAzqloZGY4SCcdpxAnj7087FPZiDvcGmMeJ8p_Gyqw1T8fJCzcV3rNN1CmaOM/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9874-auth48rfcdiff.html>
> (AUTH48 changes side by side)
>
>
> Please review the document carefully and contact us with any further
> updates you may have. Note that we do not make changes once a document is
> published as an RFC.
>
>
> We will await approvals from each party listed on the AUTH48 status page
> below prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.
>
>
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1kP-q3wtNm948keKdV4alCkAfdoKuVbnQL-6SOuuTH7KcOfka-so1TAVQQLJ4Skmp5FmL8Zgh2LNj49efbUE2bmZjUZ95ztGH_G8pN5pZUFtA2dnK4fOJnZchdwCZ-dNKZm6IEkMSwb5PXD9wSyrV7xfrHxV8Cvodhf514wtXwz1a04D16qS5X171wS88faYTvoE9GpIuao8GwCbipuER8RsVRDE8DGw9IsHLeoN50-0ugYcIypfpwYOouXxhjA4JbE8o610gyY6EGfEcrVJYwIhXkUqHrKrsYPP9xHfteGA/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9874
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1kP-q3wtNm948keKdV4alCkAfdoKuVbnQL-6SOuuTH7KcOfka-so1TAVQQLJ4Skmp5FmL8Zgh2LNj49efbUE2bmZjUZ95ztGH_G8pN5pZUFtA2dnK4fOJnZchdwCZ-dNKZm6IEkMSwb5PXD9wSyrV7xfrHxV8Cvodhf514wtXwz1a04D16qS5X171wS88faYTvoE9GpIuao8GwCbipuER8RsVRDE8DGw9IsHLeoN50-0ugYcIypfpwYOouXxhjA4JbE8o610gyY6EGfEcrVJYwIhXkUqHrKrsYPP9xHfteGA/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9874
> >
>
>
> Thank you,
> Alanna Paloma
> RFC Production Center
>
>
> > On Sep 23, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck=
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2025 1:26 AM
> >> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected] <mailto:
> [email protected]>>; Carroll, William
> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>;
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>;
> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9874
> >> <draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-
> >> bcp-10> for your review
> >>
> >> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> click
> >> links
> >> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
> >> safe.
> >>
> >> Authors,
> >>
> >> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as
> necessary)
> >> the following questions, which are also in the source file.
> >
> > [SAH] We've noted our responses below. In addition, we've found one term
> that's used in the text that requires an additional sentence for
> clarification. We've already discussed the topic with Orie (cc'd here), and
> he's approved our approach to adding a clarification to the text in Section
> 5.
> >
> > OLD
> > Notably, the scope of any practice discussed here is the EPP server that
> adopts the practice and the domains managed by it.
> >
> > NEW
> > Notably, the scope of any practice discussed here is the EPP server that
> adopts the practice, the domains managed by it, and the associated host
> objects where "associated" is described in RFCs 5731 [RFC5731] and 5732
> [RFC5732].
> >
> >> 1) <!--[rfced] This document has been assigned a new BCP number.
> >> Please let us know if this is not correct (i.e., it should be part of
> an
> >> existing
> >> BCP).
> >>
> >> See the complete list of BCPs here:
> >> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ronHlStzrkPTBidwHiueJ0APXes- <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ronHlStzrkPTBidwHiueJ0APXes->
> >> JyLb_dBGHiEBdouxvSEF3wsn6jC3V4DvPr1VhLhhmMtJ3PrSfqL4D1UWipGqCuX7I
> >> 39p4_j44l207oCjAyU89hiCwVaFSc0p240fujlWKdNUEvGwVfq_ajLa7iv1seDnOQ6e
> >> qr_JXbQbRGq2tgVkIbPQ7UOk0E_ahr9cbqPEundX3WkSEMpW_kBkjtB17xI35eaE
> >> uQwK25lRO5DfaaLfj4EzXud5tFWHUBHdfa-
> >> R0oCzlVaYWhRVjnLJ1blksuw72gt0t2LF1VqTKfk/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-
> >> editor.org%2Fbcps
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] This is correct. A new BCP number should be assigned.
> >
> >> 2) <!--[rfced] We note that Scott Hollenbeck and William Carroll have
> the
> >> same
> >> authors' address listed. However, Scott's organization is listed as
> >> "Verisign Labs",
> >> while William's is "Verisign". Should these be made consistent in the
> >> following
> >> and the document header?
> >>
> >> Scott Hollenbeck
> >> Verisign Labs
> >> 12061 Bluemont Way
> >> Reston, VA 20190
> >> United States of America
> >> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> URI: https://secure-
> >> web.cisco.com/1lym9v5MxG01dIeXO4nDizhfNw4aZYvxr5Yh2KEWudPWvPviy-
> >> F4S2kDdzwSRDDnORgAAeCwsE-
> >> HYoDEj3QkF6YU91pIOMAkWxJdkQMKXvTmiUfhx67ZQTrYEpO_4ss9XK4n7RaybL
> >> T8diXMcVmImU8u6x5qFtiZSb5Zl6wwsPsLN5bGezyF5zimFvxjZA5xtWKzxS2Fekf-
> >> wFq2dqWbVh1OEkMpeKIohu6M4VRAcxy80ZRXFPIDFVQd17bFfkc00R6qA2j1CKd
> >> L5wS-i8SeJjvtWRA-wbKTAm_SSnLyjPENwvT_l2hH7iY9ueBE3c46-
> >> /https%3A%2F%2Fwww.verisignlabs.com%2F
> >>
> >>
> >> William Carroll
> >> Verisign
> >> 12061 Bluemont Way
> >> Reston, VA 20190
> >> United States of America
> >> Phone: +1 703 948-3200
> >> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> URI: https://verisign.com <https://verisign.com>
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] Yes, please use Verisign Labs for both.
> >
> >> 3) <!--[rfced] For clarity, may we add citations to [RFC5731] and
> [RFC5732]
> >> in
> >> this sentence?
> >>
> >> Original:
> >> This document describes the rationale for the "SHOULD NOT be deleted"
> >> text and the risk associated with host object renaming.
> >>
> >> Perhaps:
> >> This document describes the rationale for the "SHOULD NOT be deleted"
> >> text in [RFC5731] and [RFC5732] as well as the risk associated with
> >> host object renaming.
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] Sure, that's fine.
> >
> >> 4) <!-- [rfced] FYI - Some sentences cite RFCs 5731 and 5732 but did
> not
> >> include
> >> cite tags. We have added cite tags to these citations. For example:
> >>
> >> Original:
> >> The text in RFCs 5731 and 5732 was written to
> >> encourage clients to take singular, discrete steps to delete objects
> >> in a way that avoids breaking DNS resolution functionality.
> >>
> >> Current:
> >> The text in [RFC5731] and [RFC5732] was written to
> >> encourage clients to take singular, discrete steps to delete objects
> >> in a way that avoids breaking DNS resolution functionality.
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] That's fine.
> >
> >> 5) <!--[rfced] To improve readability, may we update "as can" to "which
> can"
> >> below?
> >>
> >> Original:
> >> Implementations of EPP can have dependencies on the hierarchical
> >> domain object/host object relationship, as can exist in a relational
> >> database.
> >>
> >> Perhaps:
> >> Implementations of EPP can have dependencies on the hierarchical
> >> domain object/host object relationship, which can exist in a relational
> >> database.
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] That's fine.
> >
> >> 6) <!-- [rfced] We note that [RFC7535] uses "EMPTY.AS112.ARPA" rather
> than
> >> "empty.as112.arpa". Should this be updated to match [RFC7535]?
> >>
> >> Current:
> >> "empty.as112.arpa" is designed to be used with DNAME aliasing, not
> >> as a parent domain for sacrificial name servers (see Section 3 of
> >> [RFC7535]).
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] Yes, please use uppercase characters.
> >
> >> 7) <!--[rfced] Does "removed from the zone" apply to both "domains with
> no
> >> remaining name servers" and "domains with only one remaining name
> server"?
> >> If yes, may we update this sentence as follows? Note that this sentence
> >> occurs
> >> in Sections 5.2.1.1.2 and 5.2.2.1.2.
> >>
> >> Original:
> >> This could result in domains with no remaining name servers being
> >> removed from the zone or domains with only one remaining name server.
> >>
> >> Perhaps:
> >> This could result in domains with no remaining name servers or
> >> with only one remaining name server being removed from the zone.
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] We'd prefer something like this:
> >
> > "This could result in domains with no name servers being removed from
> the zone
> > or domains with only one name server remaining in the zone."
> >
> >> 8) <!-- [rfced] Informative reference RFC 8499 has been obsoleted by
> RFC
> >> 9499.
> >> May we update the reference to point to RFC 9499? We note that
> "NXDOMAIN"
> >> is mentioned in RFC 9499.
> >>
> >> RFC 8499 is cited in the text as follows:
> >> Requests to the root for this domain would result
> >> in NXDOMAIN response [RFC8499].
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] Yes, that's fine.
> >
> >> 9) <!--[rfced] FYI - We have alphabetized the names listed in the
> >> Acknowledgments section. We believe that was the intent as only one was
> out
> >> of order. Let us know if you prefer the original order.
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] That change is fine.
> >
> >> 10) <!--[rfced] FYI - As both "nameserver" and "name server" were used
> >> throughout the document. We have updated all instances to "name server"
> >> for consistency. Please review and let us know of any objections.
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] That's fine.
> >
> >> 11) <!--[rfced] FYI - We have added an expansion for the following
> >> abbreviation per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"). Please
> review
> >> each expansion in the document carefully to ensure correctness.
> >>
> >> Top-Level Domain (TLD)
> >> -->
> >
> > [SAH] That's fine.
> >
> >> 12) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the
> >> online Style Guide <https://secure-
> >> web.cisco.com/1SkvcGcLm7rHlDGJeQZxcpRT54XiBPIq-Oqx5h7-
> >> qRg4O9nPsnGqiyMqmH-
> >> rKQBq4nIXXFLxhvTkvkkZLe540tVqQB4p7wC3MFE7v31khFUWS9Oer5ejV9N-
> >> 8LRYEtciO2SjvDf9O40-9QMUe_T-
> >> 2KFhOVFL5FS_mCXnLAyO8ubttjPUlzYQKrQ_s3VZsbKwtTWqKzSSRhgJLmko7ipCX0
> >> CZ5Ipol7QzPLs9hXdCsoTvRgGOPFMynO70OSH5HPy-
> >> EMj8muo7qdjpJ3dPb3VbgWmUJGvJqCZF7JRBa2nq4ocE/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> >> rfc-editor.org%2Fstyleguide%2Fpart2%2F%23inclusive_language>
> >> and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this nature
> >> typically result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers.
> >>
> >> Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this
> should
> >> still be reviewed as a best practice.
> >> -->
> >
> > All good - thanks!
> >
> > Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to