Hi Amanda,

Thank you for making those changes. We have some additional capitalization 
updates.

Please capitalize “option” in the following instances in the Description column 
in the "IPFIX Information Elements” registry 
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-information-elements>.

See the edited document here: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870-rfcdiff.html


1) ElementID 525 udpSafeOptions

Old:
   The presence of udpSafeExIDList is an indication that the SAFE
   Experimental option is observed in a Flow.

New:
   The presence of udpSafeExIDList is an indication that the SAFE
   Experimental Option is observed in a Flow.


2) ElementID 526 udpUnsafeOptions

Old:
   The presence of udpUnsafeExIDList is an indication that the UNSAFE
   Experimental option is observed in a Flow. 

New:
   The presence of udpUnsafeExIDList is an indication that the UNSAFE
   Experimental Option is observed in a Flow.


3) ElementID 527 udpExID

Old:
   Observed ExID in an Experimental (EXP, Kind=127) option
   or an UNSAFE Experimental (UEXP, Kind=254) option.
  
New:
   Observed ExID in an Experimental (EXP, Kind=127) Option
   or an UNSAFE Experimental (UEXP, Kind=254) Option.


4) ElementID 528 udpSafeExIDList

Old:
   Observed ExIDs in the Experimental (EXP, Kind=127)
   option.

   A basicList of udpExID Information Elements in which each udpExID
   Information Element carries the ExID observed in an EXP option.

New:
   Observed ExIDs in the Experimental (EXP, Kind=127)
   Option.

   A basicList of udpExID Information Elements in which each udpExID
   Information Element carries the ExID observed in an EXP Option.


5) ElementID 529 udpUnsafeExIDList

Old:
   Observed ExIDs in the UNSAFE Experimental (UEXP,
   Kind=254) option.

   A basicList of udpExID Information Elements in which each udpExID
   Information Element carries the ExID observed in an UEXP option.

New:
   Observed ExIDs in the UNSAFE Experimental (UEXP,
   Kind=254) Option.

   A basicList of udpExID Information Elements in which each udpExID
   Information Element carries the ExID observed in an UEXP Option.


Thank you,
Alanna Paloma
RFC Production Center


> On Sep 23, 2025, at 1:00 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alanna, all,
> 
> These updates are complete:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> IANA Operations Sr. Manager
> 
> On Mon Sep 22 17:15:23 2025, [email protected] wrote:
>> IANA,
>> 
>> Please update the Description and Additional Information columns of
>> the "IPFIX Information Elements” registry
>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-information-
>> elements> as follows.
>> 
>> See the edited document here:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870-rfcdiff.html
>> 
>> 
>> 1) Please update the Description and Additional Information of
>> ElementID 525 udpSafeOptions as follows:
>> - remove hyphen from “least-significant"
>> - add comma between “IE” and “while”
>> - remove hyphen from “most-significant”
>> - move “to 1” to the end of the sentence
>> - add quotes around registry name
>> 
>> Old:
>> Description:
>> UDP option Kind 0 corresponds to the least-significant bit in the
>> udpSafeOptions IE while Kind 191 corresponds to the 65th most-
>> significant bit of the IE.
>> …
>> The 64 most-significant bits MUST be set to 0.
>> …
>> In order to optimize the use of the reduced-size encoding in the
>> presence of udpSafeExIDList IE, the Exporter MUST NOT set to 1 the EXP
>> flag of the   udpSafeOptions IE that is reported for the same Flow.
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the UDP Option Kind Numbers registry at [IANA_UDP_OPTIONS].
>> 
>> New:
>> Description:
>> UDP option Kind 0 corresponds to the least significant bit in the
>> udpSafeOptions IE, while Kind 191 corresponds to the 65th most
>> significant bit of the IE.
>> …
>> The 64 most significant bits MUST be set to 0.
>> …
>> In order to optimize the use of the reduced-size encoding in the
>> presence of udpSafeExIDList IE, the Exporter MUST NOT set the EXP flag
>> of the udpSafeOptions IE that is reported for the same Flow to 1.
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the "UDP Option Kind Numbers" registry at [UDP_OPTIONS].
>> 
>> 
>> 2) Please update the Description and Additional Information of
>> ElementID 526 udpUnsafeOptions as follows:
>> - remove hyphen from “least-significant”
>> - add comma between “IE” and “while”
>> - remove hyphen from “most-significant”
>> - move “to 1” to the end of the sentence
>> - add quotes around registry name
>> 
>> Old:
>> Description:
>> UDP option Kind 192 corresponds to the least-significant bit in the
>> udpUnsafeOptions IE while Kind 255 corresponds to the most-significant
>> bit of the IE.
>> …
>> In order to optimize the use of the reduced-size encoding in the
>> presence of udpUnsafeExIDList IE, the Exporter MUST NOT set to 1 the
>> UEXP flag of the udpUnsafeOptions IE that is reported for the same
>> Flow.
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the UDP Option Kind Numbers registry at [IANA_UDP_OPTIONS].
>> 
>> New:
>> Description:
>> UDP option Kind 192 corresponds to the least significant bit in the
>> udpUnsafeOptions IE, while Kind 255 corresponds to the most
>> significant bit of the IE.
>> …
>> In order to optimize the use of the reduced-size encoding in the
>> presence of udpUnsafeExIDList IE, the Exporter MUST NOT set the UEXP
>> flag of the udpUnsafeOptions IE that is reported for the same Flow to
>> 1.
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the "UDP Option Kind Numbers" registry at [UDP_OPTIONS].
>> 
>> 
>> 3) Please update the Description and Additional Information of
>> ElementID 527 udpExID as follows:
>> - move “option” after "(EXP, Kind=127)”
>> - move “option” after "(UEXP, Kind=254)”
>> - add quotes around registry name
>> 
>> Old:
>> Description:
>> Observed ExID in an Experimental option (EXP, Kind=127) or an UNSAFE
>> Experimental option (UEXP, Kind=254).
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the TCP/UDP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP/UDP
>> ExIDs) registry at [IANA_TCP-UDP_ExIDs].
>> 
>> New:
>> Description:
>> Observed ExID in an Experimental (EXP, Kind=127) option or an UNSAFE
>> Experimental (UEXP, Kind=254) option.
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the "TCP/UDP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP/UDP
>> ExIDs)" registry at [UDP_ExIDs].
>> 
>> 
>> 4) Please update the Description and Additional Information of
>> ElementID 528 udpSafeExIDList as follows:
>> - move “option” after "(EXP, Kind=127)”
>> - add quotes around registry name
>> 
>> Old:
>> Description:
>> Observed ExIDs in the Experimental option (EXP, Kind=127).
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the TCP/UDP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP/UDP
>> ExIDs) registry at [IANA_TCP-UDP_ExIDs].
>> 
>> New:
>> Description:
>> Observed ExIDs in the Experimental (EXP, Kind=127) option.
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the "TCP/UDP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP/UDP
>> ExIDs)" registry at [UDP_ExIDs].
>> 
>> 
>> 5) Please update the Description and Additional Information on
>> ElementID 529 udpUnsafeExIDList as follows:
>> - move “option” after "(UEXP, Kind=254)"
>> - add quotes around registry name
>> 
>> Old:
>> Description:
>> Observed ExIDs in the UNSAFE Experimental option (UEXP, Kind=254).
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the TCP/UDP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP/UDP
>> ExIDs) registry at [IANA_TCP-UDP_ExIDs].
>> 
>> New:
>> Description:
>> Observed ExIDs in the UNSAFE Experimental (UEXP, Kind=254) option
>> 
>> Additional Information:
>> See the "TCP/UDP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP/UDP
>> ExIDs)" registry at [UDP_ExIDs].
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Alanna Paloma
>> RFC Production Center
>> 
>>> On Sep 22, 2025, at 10:10 AM, Alanna Paloma <[email protected]
>>> editor.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Authors,
>>> 
>>> Per Med’s response, we have capitalized to use “UDP Options”
>>> throughout the document.
>>> 
>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870.xml
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870.txt
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870.html
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870.pdf
>>> 
>>> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870-diff.html (comprehensive
>>> diff)
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870-auth48diff.html (AUTH48
>>> changes)
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9870-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48
>>> changes side by side)
>>> 
>>> We will now ask IANA to update their registry accordingly. After the
>>> IANA updates are complete, we will move forward with the publication
>>> process.
>>> 
>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9870
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Alanna Paloma
>>> RFC Production Center
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 19, 2025, at 11:19 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Alanna,
>>>> 
>>>>> We have one additional question. Would you like instances of “UDP
>>>>> option” to be updated to “UDP Option"? This would reflect usage in
>>>>> RFCs-to-be 9868 and 9869.
>>>> 
>>>> Please use “UDP Option" for consistency. Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Med
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>> De : Alanna Paloma <[email protected]>
>>>>> Envoyé : vendredi 19 septembre 2025 18:40
>>>>> À : tirumal reddy <[email protected]>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> Cc : [email protected]; [email protected]; opsawg-
>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected];
>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>>> Objet : Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9870 <draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-
>>>>> ipfix-14> for your review
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Authors,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tiru’s approval has been noted on the AUTH48 status page:
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>> www.rfc-
>>>>> editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9870&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o
>>>>> range.com%7Cab27b1b261024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc4
>>>>> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638938968184375020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
>>>>> 8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOI
>>>>> joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d4F%2FehIqsB5RgTjRu
>>>>> 4Ur%2FBe3j21%2FUhrPgmVsVP03aLI%3D&reserved=0
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have one additional question. Would you like instances of “UDP
>>>>> option” to be updated to “UDP Option"? This would reflect usage in
>>>>> RFCs-to-be 9868 and 9869.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Alanna Paloma
>>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sep 19, 2025, at 3:05 AM, tirumal reddy <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Updates to the draft look good to me. I approve publication of
>>>>> the document.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> -Tiru
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Sept 2025 at 01:51, Alanna Paloma <[email protected]
>>>>> editor.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Med,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the
>>>>> AUTH48 status page:
>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>> www.
>>>>>> rfc-
>>>>> editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9870&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o
>>>>>> 
>>>>> range.com%7Cab27b1b261024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc4
>>>>> 8b92
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638938968184398849%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
>>>>> FbXB
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpb
>>>>> CIsI
>>>>>> 
>>>>> ldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RP%2FM7nIIKNy%2Fn%2BrIQVtpa2Z5L
>>>>> TqkM
>>>>>> B8Scc4RHwLDHNg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> One related comment triggered by "least-signification"/"most-
>>>>> signification" to "least signification"/"most signification"
>>>>> changes: I checked recent IPFIX-related RFCs to see if we are
>>>>> consistent, which is indeed the case for 9740 in particular.
>>>>> However, I noted that the use in RFC9740 was not echoed in the
>>>>> IANA registry
>>>>> (https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>>>>> Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2Fipfix.xhtml&data=05%7C02%7Cm
>>>>> ohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cab27b1b261024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7
>>>>> C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638938968184413849%7CU
>>>>> nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsI
>>>>> lAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata
>>>>> =PhtD0W8GY7zHI8WuOms0N%2BlB9eJoYGzJB6s1nh5ypnc%3D&reserved=0) for
>>>>> these IEs:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> * ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull
>>>>>>> * tcpOptionsFull
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Can we please report that to IANA and update as appropriate?
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Per your suggestion, we have sent mail to IANA requesting
>>>>> updates to the "IPFIX Information Elements” registry; see the IANA
>>>>> email thread for RFC 9740.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Once we receive approval from Tirumaleswar, we will move this
>>>>> document forward in the publication process.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Alanna Paloma
>>>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2025, at 10:58 PM, [email protected]
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Alana, all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you for preparing this edited version.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please see inline.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Med
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>>>> De : [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>>> Envoyé :
>>>>>>>> lundi 15 septembre 2025 22:31 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc :
>>>>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; opsawg-
>>>>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected];
>>>>> [email protected];
>>>>>>>> [email protected] Objet : Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be
>>>>> 9870
>>>>>>>> <draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-
>>>>>>>> ipfix-14> for your review
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Authors,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve
>>>>> (as
>>>>>>>> necessary) the following questions, which are also in the
>>>>> source
>>>>>>>> file.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1) <!--[rfced] Acronyms
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> a) FYI - We have added expansions for the following
>>>>> abbreviations
>>>>>>>> per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"). Please
>>>>> review each
>>>>>>>> expansion in the document carefully to ensure correctness.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)  Stream Control
>>>>>>>> Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [Med] ACK.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> b) FYI - We have updated the expansion of "APC" to reflect
>>>>> how the
>>>>>>>> acronym is expanded in RFC 9868. Please let us know of any
>>>>>>>> objections.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Original:
>>>>>>>> Alternate payload checksum (APC)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Current:
>>>>>>>> Additional Payload Checksum (APC)
>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [Med] Agree with the change to align with the latest use of
>>>>> APC in the UDP options spec.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I see that it was changed in
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>> author-tools.ietf.org%2Fiddiff%3Furl1%3Ddraft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-
>>>>> options-32%26url2%3Ddraft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-31%26difftype%3D-
>>>>> -
>>>>> html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cab27b1b261024
>>>>> da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6
>>>>> 38938968184428297%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUs
>>>>> IlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%
>>>>> 3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YYg%2BaJLoBf%2B%2FPcl3E%2BB1lGBUefchpWnQQUjc
>>>>> xxZvgSI%3D&reserved=0.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language"
>>>>> portion of
>>>>>>>> the online  Style Guide
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>>>>>>>> Fwww.rfc-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> editor.org%2Fstyleguide%2Fpart2%2F%23inclusive_language&data=05%7C
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6389356510391909
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 45%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDA
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> wMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> &sdata=WMcc6HApPnUDtptad%2FuW0VEPM3OgOAAAnmb7iyiOS1g%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> and let us know if any changes are needed.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Note that our script did not flag any words in particular,
>>>>> but this
>>>>>>>> should still be reviewed as a best practice.
>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [Med] Nothing flagged on my side as well.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I also reviewed the full edited version and all looks good to
>>>>> me. I approve the publication of this version. Thanks.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> One related comment triggered by "least-signification"/"most-
>>>>> signification" to "least signification"/"most signification"
>>>>> changes: I checked recent IPFIX-related RFCs to see if we are
>>>>> consistent, which is indeed the case for 9740 in particular.
>>>>> However, I noted that the use in RFC9740 was not echoed in the
>>>>> IANA registry
>>>>> (https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>>>>> Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2Fipfix.xhtml&data=05%7C02%7Cm
>>>>> ohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cab27b1b261024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7
>>>>> C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638938968184446557%7CU
>>>>> nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsI
>>>>> lAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata
>>>>> =xEUylrNknr0edyCXA%2BkeP16%2FGUEljFH5VydOy4XTwCU%3D&reserved=0)
>>>>> for these IEs:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> * ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull
>>>>>>> * tcpOptionsFull
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Can we please report that to IANA and update as appropriate?
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Med
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>> Alanna Paloma and Sandy Ginoza
>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2025, at 1:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *****IMPORTANT*****
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Updated 2025/09/15
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> RFC Author(s):
>>>>>>>> --------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been
>>>>> reviewed
>>>>>>>> and approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published
>>>>> as an
>>>>>>>> RFC.
>>>>>>>> If an author is no longer available, there are several
>>>>> remedies
>>>>>>>> available as listed in the FAQ
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> (https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>>>>>>>> Fwww.rfc-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> editor.org%2Ffaq%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 7C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> d20%7C0%7C0%7C638935651039222510%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0e
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> U1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCI
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> sIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nlf%2BSNGTDcV3a1bJdqUluHA62rx
>>>>>>>> vGbF5dm%2Bf9rAlFMQ%3D&reserved=0).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other
>>>>> parties
>>>>>>>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before
>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> your approval.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Planning your review
>>>>>>>> ---------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please review the following aspects of your document:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  RFC Editor questions
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC
>>>>> Editor
>>>>>>>> that have been included in the XML file as comments marked
>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> <!-- [rfced] ... -->
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  Changes submitted by coauthors
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
>>>>>>>> coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
>>>>>>>> agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  Content
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please review the full content of the document, as this
>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>> change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular
>>>>>>>> attention to:
>>>>>>>> - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>>>>>>>> - contact information
>>>>>>>> - references
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  Copyright notices and legends
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
>>>>>>>> (TLP -
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> trustee.ietf.org%2Flicense-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> info&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C3652b4017ff74
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 7b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 38935651039237298%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUs
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> IlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yoMJIzGJNfmGQZyP%2B56EkpX5C5lYO0pmN53zTB6mEO
>>>>>>>> w%3D&reserved=0).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  Semantic markup
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that
>>>>> elements
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that
>>>>>>>> <sourcecode>
>>>>>>>> and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
>>>>>>>> Fauthors.ietf.org%2Frfcxml-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> vocabulary&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C3652b40
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 17ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> C0%7C638935651039252102%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOn
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> RydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoy
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> fQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0Msc2MHFE9HshA5mwdq4qQMTZoIf20%2BuXYKr
>>>>>>>> alt9YS8%3D&reserved=0>.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  Formatted output
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML
>>>>> file,
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
>>>>>>>> limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Submitting changes
>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To submit changes, please reply to this email using 'REPLY
>>>>> ALL' as
>>>>>>>> all the parties CCed on this message need to see your
>>>>> changes. The
>>>>>>>> parties
>>>>>>>> include:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  your coauthors
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  [email protected] (the RPC team)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  other document participants, depending on the stream
>>>>> (e.g.,
>>>>>>>> IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs,
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  [email protected], which is a new archival
>>>>> mailing
>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>   to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active
>>>>>>>> discussion
>>>>>>>>   list:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  More info:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> mailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fietf-announce%2Fyb6lpIGh-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638935651039266250%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIs
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> IldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7ndKEhYEhZz1YXVuUVEZ69Dp2JFl8Z
>>>>>>>> 2nnZHwDzjROE0%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  The archive itself:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> mailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fbrowse%2Fauth48archive%2F&data=05%7C
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6389356510392800
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 53%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDA
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> wMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> &sdata=RuyAiLfgaqZT0YPfTBXRrR1FuaDluTnyPg508%2BguA%2Bw%3D&reserved
>>>>>>>> =0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may
>>>>> temporarily opt
>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>     of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a
>>>>> sensitive
>>>>>>>> matter).
>>>>>>>>     If needed, please add a note at the top of the message
>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>     have dropped the address. When the discussion is
>>>>> concluded,
>>>>>>>> [email protected] will be re-added to the
>>>>> CC list
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>     its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> An update to the provided XML file
>>>>>>>> - OR -
>>>>>>>> An explicit list of changes in this format
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Section # (or indicate Global)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> OLD:
>>>>>>>> old text
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> NEW:
>>>>>>>> new text
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an
>>>>>>>> explicit list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any
>>>>> changes that
>>>>>>>> seem beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text,
>>>>>>>> deletion of text, and technical changes.  Information about
>>>>> stream
>>>>>>>> managers can be found in the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not
>>>>> require
>>>>>>>> approval from a stream manager.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Approving for publication
>>>>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this
>>>>> email
>>>>>>>> stating that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please
>>>>> use
>>>>>>>> 'REPLY ALL', as all the parties CCed on this message need to
>>>>> see
>>>>>>>> your approval.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Files
>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The files are available here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw
>>>>> w
>>>>>>>> w.rfc-
>>>>> %2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cab27b1b26
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 1024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0
>>>>> %
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 7C638938968184490630%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRyd
>>>>> W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> UsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3
>>>>> D
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=l%2Fp2fgiGSElNiJzvCXZF7c%2FsJwQOX3STyrrYAk0
>>>>> j
>>>>>>>> 4T0%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9870.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> r%40orange.com%7C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638935651039293891%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> Zsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIs
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WvHMelNRQIxee9
>>>>>>>> i9bTQGZPbckfBnvRQ7Ee5oCAQecao%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw
>>>>> w
>>>>>>>> w.rfc-
>>>>> %2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cab27b1b26
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 1024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0
>>>>> %
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 7C638938968184509542%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRyd
>>>>> W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> UsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3
>>>>> D
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wz8IgS3UypC4kRrqNS7AF%2BMsQVTVgJK9CfhoFQkjO
>>>>> p
>>>>>>>> o%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9870.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> ir%40orange.com%7C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b4
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 0bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638935651039307486%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> GZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6keCGAFqE2R0v
>>>>>>>> lPDfA1r6TTFnNdJIykAAdwCofBRNRk%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw
>>>>> w
>>>>>>>> w.rfc-
>>>>> %2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cab27b1b26
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 1024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0
>>>>> %
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 7C638938968184534127%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRyd
>>>>> W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> UsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3
>>>>> D
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8Bmw4%2FcKDxh5a6kUb8eyZWZr8GgiQM%2FkSOas3yv
>>>>> h
>>>>>>>> 0%2BM%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9870.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> r%40orange.com%7C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638935651039320875%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> Zsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIs
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=IX5pJb607%2BvN
>>>>>>>> %2B84ohXd1jXwcUuIYscsSmgI3mHFqoWc%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw
>>>>> w
>>>>>>>> w.rfc-
>>>>> %2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cab27b1b26
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 1024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0
>>>>> %
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 7C638938968184555052%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRyd
>>>>> W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> UsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3
>>>>> D
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=oYnjw4hq1DWqpHRO3gBbFhALM26DgEyJBcrwWT7eR6E
>>>>> %
>>>>>>>> 3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9870.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadai
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> r%40orange.com%7C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638935651039334119%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> Zsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIs
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FrJRCOqLrf%2
>>>>>>>> F04nuVM7hYWhJ7D%2Fdw8JFwhIGrDbfVgPM%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Diff file of the text:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw
>>>>> w
>>>>>>>> w.rfc-
>>>>> editor.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> Cab27b1b261024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 0%7C0%7C0%7C638938968184573555%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1
>>>>> h
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> cGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIl
>>>>> d
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> UIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PUe8PU6Fs1JswHkDn73cqmkgvSWZS9Q8g
>>>>> f
>>>>>>>> 6c12SsuTo%3D&reserved=0%2Fauthors%2Frfc9870-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C3652b401
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 7ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 0%7C638935651039347876%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnR
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> ydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyf
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> Q%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UXTnYXMR8Lem2igZgbvMk2GPkPmESqEziXpy35t
>>>>>>>> raFU%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw
>>>>> w
>>>>>>>> w.rfc-
>>>>> editor.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> Cab27b1b261024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 0%7C0%7C0%7C638938968184591834%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1
>>>>> h
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> cGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIl
>>>>> d
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> UIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lelNc8%2BU5ME8bNsjgyNWtMaA0nPz%2F
>>>>> P
>>>>>>>> 1YGdkZsckxn7A%3D&reserved=0%2Fauthors%2Frfc9870-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C3652b
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> %7C0%7C638935651039365493%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIj
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> oyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tAiGQ%2Fpj0rm3SmgpYzTYeZUtVpSz04TMV%
>>>>>>>> 2FuP2OHIHYc%3D&reserved=0 (side by side)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Diff of the XML:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw
>>>>> w
>>>>>>>> w.rfc-
>>>>> editor.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> Cab27b1b261024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 0%7C0%7C0%7C638938968184609594%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1
>>>>> h
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> cGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIl
>>>>> d
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> UIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qzrPW9DdvWDZKWojXiw%2FcSJE0PWNyc1
>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>> Q8GxgvRiT2s%3D&reserved=0%2Fauthors%2Frfc9870-
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C3652
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 0%7C0%7C638935651039380507%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGk
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> iOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUI
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> joyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vJX82ROvkGGcOQNE7Vc3jb5Ol38WjMWl1ek
>>>>>>>> 7J4ed99g%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Tracking progress
>>>>>>>> -----------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fw
>>>>> w
>>>>>>>> w.rfc-
>>>>> %2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cab27b1b26
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 1024da9898708ddf79b33b7%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0
>>>>> %
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 7C638938968184627077%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRyd
>>>>> W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> UsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3
>>>>> D
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KcSiBYaOTf2vpj5Xd%2BsqmlBigzgECxrIGAMe%2FCz
>>>>> t
>>>>>>>> ogo%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9870&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> range.com%7C3652b4017ff747b4ccb708ddf496d8b3%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc4
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638935651039393761%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOI
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r%2B6IRRevcUXDpUxZm
>>>>>>>> fcG5iFFpjGqm1SWozvChbPnZuk%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you for your cooperation,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> RFC Editor
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> RFC 9870 (draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-14)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Title            : Export of UDP Options Information in IP
>>>>> Flow
>>>>>>>> Information Export (IPFIX)
>>>>>>>> Author(s)        : M. Boucadair, T. Reddy.K
>>>>>>>> WG Chair(s)      : Joe Clarke, Benoît Claise
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Area Director(s) : Mohamed Boucadair, Mahesh Jethanandani
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>>>> __
>>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
>>>>> informations
>>>>>>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre
>>>>>>> diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
>>>>> recu
>>>>>>> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et
>>>>> le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
>>>>> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline
>>>>> toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
>>>>> falsifie. Merci.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
>>>>>>> privileged information that may be protected by law; they
>>>>> should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>>>>>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the
>>>>> sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>>>>>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages
>>>>> that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
>>>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>>>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous
>>>> avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>>>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
>>>> messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>>>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
>>>> deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>>> 
>>>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
>>>> privileged information that may be protected by law;
>>>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without
>>>> authorisation.
>>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>> and delete this message and its attachments.
>>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that
>>>> have been modified, changed or falsified.
>>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> 
> 


-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to