On 22/09/2025 19:58, Sarah Tarrant wrote:
Hi Gorry,
My apologies for not being clear. XML would definitely be the preferred format.
However, as I'm taking another look at the file, Figure 2 appears to be a
table. We would ask if we could just format the xml as a table instead of
trying to work with you and your co-authors to build the SVG.
Thoughts?
Sarah Tarrant
RFC Production Center
OK.
All understood.
I don't have energy at the moment to convert the ASCII table to XML.
Best wishes,
Gorry
On Sep 22, 2025, at 12:49 PM, Gorry Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote:
On 22/09/2025 14:27, Sarah Tarrant wrote:
Hi Gorry,
Thank you for your reply.
Regarding:
4) Is there anything else that the RPC should be aware of while editing this
document?
You will have SVG artwork for figure 1.
It would be good if figure 2 could be rendered as SVG, but contains lots of
text so we have done that yet.
The RPC is not able to render SVG artwork, but if you wanted to send along a
rendered SVG file for Figure 2, we could add it to the xml.
Sincerely,
Sarah Tarrant
RFC Production Center
Hi Sarah,
I'm not quite sure what you would like.
Here is a PDF rendered I-D and a XML version with the embeded artwork based on
the submitted -23, are either of these formats helpful?
Gorry
On Sep 20, 2025, at 1:52 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote:
4) Is there anything else that the RPC should be aware of while editing this
document?
You will have SVG artwork for figure 1.
It would be good if figure 2 could be rendered as SVG, but contains lots of
text so we have done that yet.
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
