Sorry I should have waited to send this after I got done with my PR — and now I’m done.
Tweak in c.3: OLD: | The example certificates in this section have key usage bits | set to digitalSignature, keyCertSign, and cRLSign to lessen the | number of examples, i.e., brevity. Certificate Policies (CPs) | [RFC3647] for production CAs should consider whether this | combination is appropriate. NOTE: The NEW: | NOTE: The example certificates in this section have key usage bits | set to digitalSignature, keyCertSign, and cRLSign to lessen the | number of examples, i.e., brevity. Certificate Policies (CPs) | [RFC3647] for production CAs should consider whether this | combination is appropriate. The spt > On Oct 28, 2025, at 10:26, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > And there I go again, it’s Table 2 ;) > > spt > >> On Oct 28, 2025, at 09:33, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> One final nit and then I approve: >> >> In Appendix B, the Caption for the Table was changed from Figure to Table >> (correctly), but the reference out of the paragraph before the Table was not >> changed: >> >> s/in Figure 1,/in Table 1, >> >> Cheers, >> spt >> >>> On Oct 24, 2025, at 21:37, Sandy Ginoza <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sean, >>> >>> Thank you for your careful review! We have updated the document as >>> requested and posted the files here: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.xml >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.txt >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.pdf >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.html >>> >>> Diffs highlighting the recent updates only: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastdiff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) >>> >>> AUTH48 diffs: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48diff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by >>> side) >>> >>> Comprehensive diffs: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-diff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>> >>> We were going to ask about U+03BE — thanks for saving us a roundtrip! >>> >>> Please review the files and let us know if any further updates are needed >>> or if you approve the RFC for publication. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sandy Ginoza >>> RFC Production Center >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 22, 2025, at 7:40 PM, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 22, 2025, at 18:24, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 0) We should latinize xi too! There are 5 instances of xi in s6 and 3 in >>>>> s8.1. >>>>> >>>>> For the first instance, i think it’s: >>>>> >>>>> OLD: >>>>> a 32-octet seed (xi) and >>>>> >>>>> NEW: >>>>> a 32-octet see (ξ) (GREEK SMALL LETTER XI, U+039E) and >>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry it’s U+03BE. >>>> >>>> spt >>> >>> >> >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
