Hi, I have reviewed these changes and I approve them.
Regards, OS, ART AD On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:27 AM Madison Church < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Francesca (also adding current ART ADs to this thread), > > This is a friendly reminder that we have received a new version of this > document that is currently in AUTH48. Please see > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25 to > review and approve these changes, as well as Carsten’s email below for more > information. > > Thank you! > > Madison Church > RFC Production Center > > > On Oct 14, 2025, at 10:51 AM, Lynne Bartholomew < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, Francesca. > > > > We received a New Version notification for this document. This document > is currently in the AUTH48 state. > > > > Please review < > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25> and > Carsten's email below (which provides background), and let us know if you > approve of these updates. > > > > Thank you! > > > > Lynne Bartholomew > > RFC Production Center > > > >> On Oct 13, 2025, at 2:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> > >> A new version (-25) has been submitted for draft-ietf-asdf-sdf: > >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25.txt > >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25.html > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf/ > >> > >> Diff from previous version: > >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25 > >> > >> IETF Secretariat. > >> > >> From: Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9880 <draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-24> > for your review > >> Date: October 13, 2025 at 2:13:38 AM PDT > >> To: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > >> Cc: Michael Koster <[email protected]>, Ari Keränen < > [email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Francesca Palombini < > [email protected]>, [email protected] > >> > >> RFC-editor, > >> ART ADs, > >> > >> On 2025-10-10, at 22:02, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Please note that we are also preparing a -25, with two typo/C&P fixes > and one more technical omission fixed (PR #187 to #189 in > https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pulls). > >>> We previously prepared a -24 with PR #186 in it (technical omissions), > which you already picked up. > >>> You probably need AD approval for all these. > >> > >> We now submitted the -25, which is actually now composed of the changes > in PR #187, #188, and #190 in > https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pulls?q=is%3Apr (q.v.). > >> > >> Note that the CDDL change in PR#190 triggers regeneration of the JSO. > >> Since the last regeneration, an underlying library of the conversion > tool has made some JSON prettyprinting style adjustments. > >> These actually contain some improvements (wasting less space), so even > though there is no semantic change in the JSO, we would like to use the > newly regenerated version. > >> (We did test the regenerated JSO.) > >> > >> As a result of checking in the regenerated JSO with these stylistic > improvements, there is a large amount of change noise caused in the > sourcecode element in Appendix B. > >> This is best solved by doing a wholesale replacement of the generated > >> text for the sourcecode element in Appendix B. > >> > >> Apologies for causing that work. > >> > >> Grüße, Carsten > >> > > > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
