Hi, Amanda. Great; thank you! Lynne Bartholomew RFC Production Center
> On Dec 22, 2025, at 4:13 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > These change is complete: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/dlep-parameters > > thanks, > Amanda > > On Mon Dec 22 17:10:57 2025, [email protected] wrote: >> Dear IANA, >> >> We have all author approvals for this document. >> >> Please make the following update on >> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/dlep-parameters/>, in the "Extension >> Type Values" registry: >> >> OLD: DiffServ Aware Credit Window >> >> NEW: Diffserv Aware Credit Window >> >> Thank you! >> >> Lynne Bartholomew >> RFC Production Center >> >>> On Dec 22, 2025, at 8:57 AM, Lynne Bartholomew >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Bow-Nan. >>> >>> No worries. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: >>> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> Lynne Bartholomew >>> RFC Production Center >>> >>>> On Dec 18, 2025, at 6:12 PM, Cheng, Bow-Nan - 0662 - MITLL >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm fine with this -- apologies for the delay >>>> >>>> On 12/15/25, 1:52 PM, "Lynne Bartholomew" <[email protected] >>>> editor.org <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> !------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> | >>>> This Message Is From an External Sender >>>> This message came from outside the Laboratory. >>>> |------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> ! >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear Bow-Nan, >>>> >>>> >>>> A reminder that we do not believe that we have heard from you >>>> regarding the status of this document. Please let us know whether >>>> further updates are needed or you approve this document for >>>> publication in its current form. >>>> >>>> >>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt <https://www.rfc- >>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf <https://www.rfc- >>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html <https://www.rfc- >>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml <https://www.rfc- >>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by >>>> side) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> >>>> (side by side) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> (side >>>> by side) >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >>>> >>>> >>>> The AUTH48 status page is here: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 <https://www.rfc- >>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> >>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>> RFC Production Center >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Dec 8, 2025, at 10:33 AM, Lynne Bartholomew >>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >>>>> editor.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear Bow-Nan, >>>>> >>>>> Checking in with you regarding the status of this document. Please >>>>> let us know whether further updates are needed or you approve this >>>>> document for publication in its current form. >>>>> >>>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt <https://www.rfc- >>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf <https://www.rfc- >>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html <https://www.rfc- >>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml <https://www.rfc- >>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by >>>>> side) >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html >>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> >>>>> (side by side) >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html >>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html >>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> (side >>>>> by side) >>>>> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >>>>> >>>>> The AUTH48 status page is here: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 <https://www.rfc- >>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 4, 2025, at 8:36 AM, Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >>>>>> editor.org>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, Donald. Thank you for the quick reply! We have updated >>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>> >>>>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt <https://www.rfc- >>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf <https://www.rfc- >>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html <https://www.rfc- >>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml <https://www.rfc- >>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> (side by >>>>>> side) >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> >>>>>> (side by side) >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html> >>>>>> (side by side) >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks again! >>>>>> >>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 3, 2025, at 9:52 AM, Donald Eastlake <[email protected] >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:48 AM Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear authors, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The authors of companion document RFC-to-be 9893 have changed >>>>>>>> 'logical "Credit Window(s)"' to 'logical "credit window(s)"', >>>>>>>> because they went with lowercase "credit window(s)" where this >>>>>>>> term is used generally. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For consistency within this group of DLEP documents, may we >>>>>>>> change 'logical "Credit Windows"' to 'logical "credit windows"' >>>>>>>> in this document as well? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am OK with changing to lowercase. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Donald >>>>>>> =============================== >>>>>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >>>>>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA >>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently: >>>>>>>> ... Flow control is provided using one or more logical "Credit >>>>>>>> Windows", >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Nov 26, 2025, at 12:52 PM, Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, Lou. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 <https://www.rfc- >>>>>>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you very much! If you'll be celebrating the long weekend, >>>>>>>>> we hope you have a good one! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 26, 2025, at 9:05 AM, Lou Berger <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looks good to me too - thank you! >>>>>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>>>> On November 25, 2025 1:36:45 PM Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. >>>>>>>>>>> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 <https://www.rfc- >>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your help with this document! >>>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Donald Eastlake >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Lynne, >>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewed this rfc-to-be and approve publication. >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Donald >>>>>>>>>>>> =============================== >>>>>>>>>>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >>>>>>>>>>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:15 PM Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. We have changed "composed of" to "built on" per >>>>>>>>>>>> your note in email for RFC-to-be 9895: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Should "composed of" be changed to "built on" in RFC- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to-be 9894 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as well, as was done per your first note further below for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> document? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the latest rfc9894.txt: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The extension defined in this document is composed of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanisms >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald: Yes, I think the change should be made in RFC-to-be >>>>>>>>>>>>> 9894 as well. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your >>>>>>>>>>>> browser: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- >>>>>>>>>>>> auth48rfcdiff.html <https://www.rfc- >>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by >>>>>>>>>>>> side) >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastdiff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-lastrfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- >>>>>>>>>>>> lastrfcdiff.html> (side by side) >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2025, at 11:24 AM, Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Donald. Thank you for your prompt reply! We have >>>>>>>>>>>>> updated this document per your notes below. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your >>>>>>>>>>>>> browser: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48diff.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- >>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48diff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- >>>>>>>>>>>>> auth48rfcdiff.html <https://www.rfc- >>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9894-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by >>>>>>>>>>>>> side) >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff2.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew >>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2025, at 6:37 PM, Donald Eastlake >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 5:08 PM <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Authors, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve (as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary) the following questions, which are also in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) <!-- [rfced] Document title: FYI, for ease of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader and per our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process, we expanded "DLEP" in the title. Please review. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Diffserv Aware >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Credit Window >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Extension >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that appear in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> title) for use on <https://www.rfc-editor.org/search> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/search>>. --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of any other good keywords. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) <!-- [rfced] For ease of the reader, we expanded "CLI" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used, per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide" - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322>>). Please >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let us know any objections. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLI: Command-Line Interface --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since it appears the "CLI" is used only once, I suggest >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deleting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "(CLI)" and just saying "Command-Line Interface". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Section 3: We changed "the mismatch of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capabilities" to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "any mismatch in capabilities" per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension. Please let >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us know any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objections. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In either case, the mismatch of capabilities SHOULD be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reported to the user via normal network management >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanisms such as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user interface messages or error logging. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In either case, any mismatch in capabilities SHOULD be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reported to the user via normal network management >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanisms, such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as user interface messages or error logging. --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Consistency with ether-credit-extension is good. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> portion of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online Style Guide at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language>>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this nature >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typically result in more precise language, which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> helpful for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that our script did not flag any words in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular, but this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should still be reviewed as a best practice. --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not think any changes are needed for this reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6) <!-- [rfced] Please let us know if any changes are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a) The following term was used inconsistently in this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We chose to use the latter form. Please let us know any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objections. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sub-Data item / Sub-Data Item (as used elsewhere in this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and per the other documents in this group (Cluster 541 / >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C541 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C541>) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of documents) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Use of the all-caps version is fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b) The following term appears to be used inconsistently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this document. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know which form is preferred. (Note that we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated "DiffServ" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to "Diffserv" in the document already.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DiffServ Aware Credit Window Type Value / >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension Type Value --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably best to go with the more explicit version >>>>>>>>>>>>>> including the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Extension". >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald >>>>>>>>>>>>>> =============================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lynne Bartholomew and Rebecca VanRheenen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Production Center >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 14, 2025, at 2:05 PM, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *****IMPORTANT***** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Updated 2025/11/14 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Author(s): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instructions for Completing AUTH48 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as an RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If an author is no longer available, there are several >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remedies >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org/faq/ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/>). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your approval. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Planning your review >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the following aspects of your document: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * RFC Editor questions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Editor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that have been included in the XML file as comments >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!-- [rfced] ... --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Changes submitted by coauthors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to changes submitted by your coauthors. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Content >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the full content of the document, as this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention to: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - IANA considerations updates (if applicable) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - contact information >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - references >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Copyright notices and legends >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info>). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Semantic markup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elements of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sourcecode> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>>. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Formatted output >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file, is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limitations compared to the PDF and HTML. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Submitting changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To submit changes, please reply to this email using >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘REPLY ALL’ as all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the parties CCed on this message need to see your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes. The parties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * your coauthors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [email protected] <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> (the RPC team) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * other document participants, depending on the stream >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible ADs, and the document shepherd). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [email protected] <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org>, which is a new archival mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * More info: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The archive itself: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opt out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive matter). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If needed, please add a note at the top of the message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have dropped the address. When the discussion is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concluded, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> will be re-added to the CC list and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its addition will be noted at the top of the message. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may submit your changes in one of two ways: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An update to the provided XML file >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — OR — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An explicit list of changes in this format >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Section # (or indicate Global) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OLD: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old text >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new text >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and an explicit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list of changes, as either form is sufficient. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes that seem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deletion of text, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and technical changes. Information about stream managers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be found in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require approval from a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream manager. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Approving for publication >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email stating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘REPLY ALL’, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The files are available here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.xml> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.pdf> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894.txt> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diff file of the text: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-diff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-rfcdiff.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side by side) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diff of the XML: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894-xmldiff1.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9894- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmldiff1.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tracking progress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9894> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your cooperation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC Editor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFC9894 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-21) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Title : DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author(s) : B. Cheng, D. Wiggins, L. Berger, D. Eastlake >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd, Ed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WG Chair(s) : Don Fedyk, Ronald in 't Velt, Donald E. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eastlake 3rd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Area Director(s) : Jim Guichard, Ketan Talaulikar, Gunter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Van de Velde >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
