On Dec 23, 2025, at 19:34, Madison Church <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There was a draft that was attempting to register “application/schema+json” >> for the latter >> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpapi-rest-api-mediatypes-03), >> but the newer >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpapi-rest-api-mediatypes-08 >> no longer does that. >> I don’t know why, but it seems there is no registered media type right now >> for jso.json. >> So I’d stick with the name we have invented for that. > > [rfced] To clarify, should the type be listed as "application/schema+json" or > "jso.json" (or another type)? Note that we have left the type as "jso.json" > for now, but we will update to the preferred sourcecode type.
Indeed, as application/schema+json wasn’t registered, I’d stick with jso.json. Grüße, Carsten -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
