Hi Nevil, This is a friendly reminder that we await your final approval of this document’s output files and XML formatting. You may find these files below.
You may view outstanding approvals at the AUTH48 status page below: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9896 For more information about the RPC’s kramdown-rfc pilot and the two-part approval process, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_instructions_completing_auth48_using_kramdown — FILES: — XML file: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.xml XML diff: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-xmldiff1.html Output files: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.txt Diff of most recent changes: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) Diff of changes made in AUTH48: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) Diff of all changes: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-rfcdiff.html (side by side) All best, Kaelin Foody RFC Production Center > On Dec 22, 2025, at 3:10 PM, Kaelin Foody <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Nevil, Alexis, all, > > Nevil - Thank you for your reply; please note that we await your final > approval of the document’s XML formatting and output files. > > Alexis, all - Thank you for your responses. We have updated the usage of > “SVG” throughout this document accordingly. > > You may view these most recent updates in the updated files below or in the > diff here: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-lastrfcdiff.html>. > > The AUTH48 status page for this document is available here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9896 > > > — FILES: — > > XML file: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.xml > > XML diff: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-xmldiff1.html > > Output files: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.txt > > Diff of most recent changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-lastdiff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) > > Diff of changes made in AUTH48: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-auth48diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > Diff of all changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > For more information about the RPC’s kramdown-rfc pilot, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_instructions_completing_auth48_using_kramdown > > > Happy holidays and all best, > > Kaelin Foody > RFC Production Center > >> On Dec 19, 2025, at 5:46 PM, Alexis Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Alice, >> >> I don't think the proposed changes affect the readability/meaning of the doc >> so if it's more appropriate to use the terms this way, I'm fine with the >> proposed suggestions. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexis >> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 1:42 PM Alice Russo <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Authors, >> >> We realize the content of RFC-to-be 9896 has been approved; my apologies, as >> here's a usage question that has arisen late in the process -- please >> consider whether "SVGs" (plural acronym) may be updated. More detail: >> "SVGs" is not used in W3C documents (e.g., >> https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/intro.html). Some may consider "SVGs" similar to >> using a file extension in plural like "JPGs" and "PNGs". However, it reads >> oddly. We note the expansion has an 's' (in 'Graphics'), while the acronym >> remains "SVG". We propose changing each instance of "SVGs", where the update >> was applied based on the intended meaning: >> A) SVG the language --> "SVG" >> B) SVG images --> "SVG drawings" >> >> Please review and let us know if you prefer to leave the document as is or >> make updates as shown in this diff file (or otherwise): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896_proposed.html >> >> Thank you. >> >> Alice Russo >> RFC Production Center >> >> -- Current files: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9896-rfcdiff.html (all changes from >> approved I-D) > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
