Hi, Tony. Thanks for verifying the code! We have also noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9923 Thanks again! Lynne Bartholomew RFC Production Center > On Jan 12, 2026, at 11:22 AM, HANSEN, TONY L <[email protected]> wrote: > > I confirmed Donald’s report on the missing backslash and can confirm that the > code does compile and test properly with the backslash restored. > > You can mark my approval also on the AUTH48 status page. > > Tony > > From: Lynne Bartholomew <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, January 12, 2026 at 12:35 PM > To: Landon Curt Noll <[email protected]>, Donald Eastlake > <[email protected]> > Cc: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <[email protected]>, > Paul Wouters <[email protected]>, HANSEN, TONY L <[email protected]>, > [email protected] <[email protected]>, Glenn Fowler > <[email protected]>, Phong Vo <[email protected]>, > [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: LANDON's reply to Re: [ISE] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9923 > <draft-eastlake-fnv-35> for your review > > > > > Donald, we have corrected the code per your note below. Apologies, as it > appears that we accidentally removed one backslash during a previous update > (between Dec. 22 and Dec. 23). > > > Donald, we have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9923 > > Thank you! > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
