Authors, Thank you for your replies. Please see the follow-ups below. The revised files are here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9927.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9927.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9927.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9927.xml
- Adnan, good catch; updated 2.2 to "Related Documents". - Re: #3, <strong> has been removed, in keeping with RFC-to-be 9926. This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9927-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9927-rfcdiff.html (side by side) This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9927-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9927-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) We will wait to hear from you again before continuing the publication process. This page shows the AUTH48 status of your document: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9927 Thank you. Alice Russo RFC Production Center > On Jan 27, 2026, at 3:37 AM, Adnan Rashid <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear RFC Editor, > > ++ @Pascal Thubert comment. > > I disagree with the Terminology word used twice for Sections 2 and Subsection > 2.2. > > I would suggest changing 2.2 from Terminology into Terms and Concepts or > Related Documents. > > The rest of the document is fine. > > > Thank you > > Regards, > > > Adnan Rashid - Ph.D. > > Assistant Professor, > Dpt. Electrical and Information > Engineering (DEI), > Politecnico di Bari, > Via Orabona 4, 70125, Bari, Italy. > E-mail: [email protected] > [email protected] > Phone: +39-080-596-3066 > Mobile:+39 376 262 1282 > > On Jan 27, 2026, at 1:55 AM, Pascal Thubert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear RFC Editor > > I review the 3 occurrences of [rfced] in the xml and I'm good with the > proposals. In particular for "strong" the best is to retain consistency with > RFC to be 9926. > > Many thanks! > > Pascal > > Le mar. 27 janv. 2026 à 05:50, <[email protected]> a écrit : > Authors, > > While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) > the following questions, which are also in the source file. > > 1) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those that appear in > the title) for use on https://www.rfc-editor.org/search. --> > > > 2) <!-- [rfced] Some author comments are present in the XML. Please confirm > that no updates related to these comments are outstanding. Note that > the comments will be deleted prior to publication. > --> > > > 3) <!-- [rfced] Regarding usage of <strong> elements in this document. > > please review the occurrences and let us know if any updates needed > for consistency. > > In the HTML and PDF outputs, <strong> yields bold. > > In the text output, <strong> yields an asterisk before and after. > > > We suggest removing usage in this document because the asterisks > seem to clutter the text output in Sections 2.3 and 3. > --> > > > 4) <!-- [rfced] FYI, regarding [IANA.ICMP.ARO.P-FIELD], > we updated the reference's title to "P-Field Values" to match > what seems to have been intended. Please let us know if this > is not accurate. > > Original: > [IANA.ICMP.ARO.P-FIELD] > IANA, "IANA Registry for the Address Registration Option > Status Value", IANA, https://www.iana.org/assignments/ > icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml#p-field-values. > > Current: > [IANA.ICMP.ARO.P-FIELD] > IANA, "P-Field Values", > <https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters>. > --> > > > 5) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online > Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> > and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this nature typically > result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers. > > Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this should > still be reviewed as a best practice. > --> > > > Thank you. > > Alice Russo > RFC Production Center > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
