On 4/27/2011 17:22, Jean Weber wrote:
[snip]
Since you've done the work for 3.3, I think we should publish it and
then you update it for 3.4. If you have a copy of your revision, you
don't need to wait for me. We can copy the revised screenshots (if
stll relevant) into the new version.
In future it would be more efficient for you to publish your revised
editions yourself. Of course you may want others to review or check
your work though for minor fixes that may not be necessary.
Jean
Jean,
I need a little hand-holding on maintaining and publishing, and it might
be of interest to the list.
Normally, I have been placing versions in the appropriate Feedback
folder, and setting the state to "Publish internally", which makes them
show up on the review list. What should I do differently, regarding
destination and state?
I will add my name to the authors list. Any other requirements there?
I uploaded my latest MG33 (as of 0326) to the MG Feedback folder. It has
changes marked, and Comments for the two shots that need replacement
(and for one xref change that didn't show in the change tracking!). I'd
be glad to publish it, but how?
--
/tj/
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to authors-unsubscr...@documentation.openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@documentation.openoffice.org
with Subject: help
