Daniel wrote:
I don't want to adopt a design that Linda doesn't like.

Linda is a professional graphics designer. We would be wise to seek her
guidance. It would be sad if we had a sub-optimal design because we failed to
put our most skilled member in charge.

I believe in meritocracy. For the book covers, Linda should provide guidance,
and make the final decision.

+1 Well said, Daniel.

Jean wrote,
> I'd also like to hear from some other people, if anyone else has an
> opinion. Although everyone who has commented so far (including me) says
> they like Daniel's version, we're heard from only a few people.

I did not mean to advocate that page as much as people seem to think. I was
just answering Peter's request to put the logo down there. It's good to let
people try out their ideas, and this was just part of that.

That's the way I took it, as part of the discussion. The problem, if there is one, isn't on your side, Daniel -- it's on ours, when many of the rest of us get enthusiastic about something you've put up for discussion. I think we're often too ready to adopt your ideas instead of discussing and refining them first. That's not your fault! (And you have so many very good ideas.)


Cheers, Jean




Reply via email to