Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
If this is something new in this developer build, then it may be a bug rather than something to be documented. Did the stable 2.0 release work like this? If not, then I suspect a problem in the new build.

I installed several developer versions before the 2.0 release and didn't notice a problem. The latest Ubuntu release, 5.10 (Breezy) included OOo "2.0" but it was really 1.9.129. But it was installed automatically by the distribution.

When 2.0 came out, I tried to install it. For a Debian-based Linux distribution like Ubuntu, the normal way is to unpack the .tar.gz file, which produces a bunch of .rpm files, which would presumably install easily on an .rpm based distribution like RedHat, Fedora, or Mandriva.

There is a utility called 'alien' that will take the .rpms and produce .deb packages from them. These can then be installed into a Linux distribution like Debian or Ubuntu. Unfortunately, I ran into a problem converting or installing these for the 2.0 release.

Later, I found .deb files that someone had converted by a more manual process, and those worked OK. But that was somewhat different too.

Maybe the reason this one caused trouble is because it created a whole new directory in my home folder. The earlier ones might have used an existing one that already had the correct permissions. What we probably need is for the developer folks to make this process a bit more friendly, and then produce some documentation for it.

A wiki page would be good ... then it could be changed easily if the next release changes the ball game.

--
Jan Wilson, Belize

Reply via email to