Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Except now, HAVE_MALLOC, HAVE_REALLOC, and the results of AC_CHECK_DECLS > (HAVE_DECL_*) are special cases. They seem to be documented correctly > as such in the manual, but I think a mention of these in the NEWS item > would be helpful, given that you intend to keep them that way.
> (And no, I don't know the reason for each of these special cases; at > least the AC_CHECK_DECLS one looks like it's very much intended so.) Yes, the results of AC_CHECK_DECLS have always been a special case dating back to when this was a GCC macro (I think that's where it started), because it's expressing trinary information. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
