Hello Paul, * Paul Eggert wrote on Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:33:53PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm wondering whether it's the goal to release as soon as the license > > issues are resolved, how far that may be away, whether more experimental > > features should be put on a git branch first. Comments appreciated. > > Can you please remind us what those license issues are? A pointer to > lists.gnu.org would suffice.
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2007-08/msg00007.html> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2007-09/msg00000.html> Some message on gnu-prog discusses this, too, and mentions why it's taking them longer than expected. > I'm a fan of releasing soon. Sure; I'd prefer a short calm-down period of intensified testing though. ;-) > I don't see why license issues should get in the way. We can release > with GPLv3, no? AFAICS the FSF would like us to have the exception language adjusted to match GPLv3 first. Cheers, Ralf
