Hi Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 08:15:45PM CEST: > > Does this patch look okay to install?
You meant "these patches", right? > * doc/autoconf.texi (The Make Macro SHELL): Stronger wording on > the importance of proper SHELL settings. > Reported by Bruno Haible, in > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2008-04/msg00029.html. These parts are probably ok, but the discussion will still take longer (I need to check a few things first), so I would appreciate if you could wait a little bit. > + * doc/autoconf.texi: Use @command{make} throughout. > --- a/doc/autoconf.texi > +++ b/doc/autoconf.texi > @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ Portable Make Programming > * Backslash-Newline-Newline:: Empty last lines in macro definitions > * Backslash-Newline Comments:: Spanning comments across line boundaries > * Long Lines in Makefiles:: Line length limitations > -* Macros and Submakes:: @code{make macro=value} and submakes > +* Macros and Submakes:: @command{make macro=value} and submakes This is not what the texinfo manual suggests: | Use the [EMAIL PROTECTED]' command to indicate command names, such as `ls' or | `cc'. [...] | You should write the name of a program in the ordinary text font, | rather than using [EMAIL PROTECTED]', if you regard it as a new English word, | such as `Emacs' or `Bison'. | | When writing an entire shell command invocation, as in `ls -l', you | should use either [EMAIL PROTECTED]' or [EMAIL PROTECTED]' at your discretion. Cheers, Ralf
