Hi Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 06:22:11AM CEST: > According to Ralf Wildenhues on 8/14/2008 12:39 PM: > >> Also, should it be named slightly differently since it behaves more > >> like m4_map than m4_foreach? > > > > m4_map_pair maybe? > > I went with the name m4_transform_pair, since it turned out to be very > easy to add m4_transform with similar semantics but visiting one argument > at a time.
Isn't there precedence in lisp for this kind of functionality, where we can reuse names from? Cheers, Ralf
