At Tuesday 01 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de> 
wrote:
> 
> I don't mind this patch, and it has been applied since, but I'll
>  note that we cannot reasonably expect $ac_objext and $ac_exeext to
>  be internal details, subject to change.  The contents of
>  $ac_compile and $ac_link are, unfortunately, exposed and
>  practically part of the API.
Well, Eric referred to them as "internal details" in a previous mail.
And while they might not be exactly "internal", I think that relying 
on them in third-party code is bad practice, and I agree with Eric 
that we should suggest the use of $EXEEXT and $OBJEXT (which are 
AC_SUBST, and are used also by Automake IIRC).

Maybe the ChangeLog entry and the git commit message could have been 
expressed better, though.  But that's not a big deal IMHO.

Regards,
    Stefano

Reply via email to