* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 02:39:16PM CEST: > On 07/10/2010 02:20 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 02:15:41PM CEST:
> >>This breaks GCC. Is this worth a blitz 2.67 release? > > > >What breaks GCC? The commit I just pushed this morning or the `+' > >thingy that I excluded from the commit? Please do not answer yes or no. > > Pointer type sizeof. > > There is "AC_CHECK_SIZEOF(void *)" in configure.ac. Of course, GCC > forces you to use one particular Autoconf version, so strictly > speaking it is not "broken", but many other packages do not and they > will fail. Agreed. Eric, if you agree I can roll a 2.67 tomorrow (I used to have upload privs at one time, so I guess I still do). I'm not sure how available Eric is by email, though, so Cc:ing Paul just in case. Of course that only means I'll try to post as many of my remaining new Fortran macros as I can until then ... ;-) Cheers, Ralf
