On 8/18/22 09:38, Khem Raj wrote:
I think the autoconf patch should be good on its own merits regardless

It partly depends on how much we care about compatibility. Putting the 'void' in there will break pre-C89 compilers, as well as C++ compilers pretending (badly) to be C compilers. I doubt whether we care about the former any more, but the latter might be an issue.


there were few other package
builds which started to succeed after this change in autoconf

Which ones, exactly, and why?

Reply via email to