On the subject of Debian, we could probably get an RC into experimental and ask for archive rebuilds and say that we were hoping to get 2.72 approved for a bookworm stable update.
zw On Fri, Feb 3, 2023, at 2:43 AM, Frederic Berat wrote: > Hi, > > I'm also in favor of an RC release, I can then rebuild Fedora packages using > the tarball from the tester list and do some kind of A/B testing. > > Fred. > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:50 AM Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> >> > On 2 Feb 2023, at 23:17, Zack Weinberg <z...@owlfolio.org> wrote: >> > >> > Due to a series of crises with my day job, the earliest I can promise to >> > do _anything_ Autoconf related is early March. If you have time to make a >> > release before then, please do not wait for me. >> > >> >> Sorry to hear Zack, hope you're doing ok. I think your input on the issues >> we've been talking about has been enough >> for us to each a good position for now. >> >> Paul in particular, please let me know if there's something I can do to >> help. I'm already giving it the standard rounds of usage >> in Gentoo. Perhaps we could tag an RC and shove it into the platform-testers >> list? It's non-commital so while I'd like >> to move forward before March for the final release, if in the event you >> didn't feel comfortable doing that, >> we'd at least have made some progress. >> >> Best, >> sa