From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11 Aug 2000 20:11:25 +0200
I saw the earlier thread (on the autoconf list) on this topic where
someone found that `?' and \| were not portable. Has anyone found a
system on which \{m,n\} is not portable?
Most likely, seds that don't support ? and \| also don't support
\{m,n\}, as I recall that those features were introduced to USG Unix
at about the same time. Unix Version 7 didn't have them.
- portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Jim Meyering
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Paul Eggert
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Steve Robbins
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Jim Meyering
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Paul Eggert
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Eli Zaretskii
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Paul Eggert
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1... Eli Zaretskii
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Ruslan Shevchenko
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Harlan Stenn
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Eli Zaretskii
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Eli Zaretskii
