>>>>> "Mark" == Mark E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'd like to advise you that it would be fair not to support >> non-UNIX path separators on the build system. Mark> Naturally, I'll have to disagree. I don't see why Autoconf Mark> should care which path separator is used as long as Autoconf can Mark> figure it out. Sorry, but I confess I don't understand what you meant :) I can guess though, but what I guess would be in accordance with Pavel's opinion, and you start with ``I'll have to disagree''. So...?
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Mark E.
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Earnie Boyd
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Alexandre Oliva
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder