>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> Sorry, I lost context. Why can't we ask people to invoke Paul> 'CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh5 /bin/sh5 configure' on Ultrix? If Paul> there's only a few dozen users, we can just inform them of this Paul> by hand. I was considering the option of re-execing configure with a better shell for 2.51 or 2.52. but it's too late, we really want to realize the now mythical 2.50 :)
- autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Harlan Stenn
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Jim Meyering
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Jim Meyering
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ul... Akim Demaille
- RE: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ul... Tim Van Holder
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Paul Eggert
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ul... Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ul... Harlan Stenn
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Nicolas Joly
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ul... Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Eric Siegerman
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Alexandre Oliva
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Alexandre Oliva
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ul... Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Peter Eisentraut