On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 03:29:17PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote: > [fork + vfork + ac_fork + ac_vfork] > > I guess you know _I_ agree, but "the others" don't seem so. Suits me just fine. -- | | /\ |-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | / With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. - RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Eric Siegerman
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Eric Siegerman
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Paul Eggert
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Eric Siegerman
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Rüdiger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Paul Eggert
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Rüdiger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Rüdiger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Paul Eggert
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Eric Siegerman
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Akim Demaille
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Akim Demaille
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Akim Demaille
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Rüdiger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Akim Demaille
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Rüdiger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Paul Eggert