Rüdiger Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to re-kindle the discussion about options for where to put a
> programs documentation by suggesting the following patch:
Wouldn't some sort of general facility for adding a new *dir switch for a
given package be better than adding a bunch of new options that very few
packages will use (and making --help even longer)? If the worry is that
programs will use inconsistent switch names, we can always put a list of
recommendations into the manual.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
